Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

De novo Identification of Actively Translated Open Reading Frames with Ribosome Profiling Data
Published on: February 18, 2022
The pitfalls of rDNA-based AMF identification: a comparative analysis of rDNA and protein-coding genes
Franck Stefani1, Mario Laterrière2, Lobna Abdellatif1
1Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada.
None:
Intragenomic polymorphism of rDNA in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been largely overlooked in ecological and taxonomic studies, and the reliability of nuclear rDNA regions for species identification has not been comprehensively evaluated and compared with protein-coding genes. Analysis of rDNA copies from Rhizophagus irregularis strains revealed average intragenomic distances ranging from 0.08% (small subunit) to 6.9% (internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)), with a maximum of 21.1% in ITS1 within strain DAOM 197198. Intragenomic rDNA polymorphisms are widespread throughout the AM fungal phylogeny, as confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism density analysis and PacBio sequencing of 148 AM fungal cultures representing 44 species. All commonly targeted rDNA loci in ecological and taxonomic studies are polymorphic, with ITS and large subunit being the most variable, leading to paraphyletic clades and misleading phylogenetic interpretations among closely related species. No unique genetic distance threshold can be applied to identify AMF, because none of the examined protein-coding genes or partial rDNA had a barcode gap. However, indicative distance thresholds of 1% for glomalin, 1.1% for RPB1, and 1.7% for H+-ATPase provide guidance for species delimitation. This study characterizes the extent of intragenomic rDNA polymorphism in AMF, underscores the taxonomic challenges posed by highly variable loci, and describes a bioinformatics pipeline for recovering rDNA copies.
Related Concept Videos
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
The Central Dogma
RNA is the Missing Link Between DNA and Proteins
In the early 1900s, scientists discovered that DNA stores all the information needed for cellular functions and that proteins perform most of these functions. However, the mechanisms of converting genetic information into functional proteins remained unknown for many years. Initially, it was believed that a single gene is...
The Central Dogma
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
From DNA to Protein

