Using Bayesian Networks to Predict Urgent Care Visits in Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung
Brian D Gonzalez1, Xiaoyin Li1, Lisa M Gudenkauf1
1Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Purpose:
Patients receiving systemic therapy (ST) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience toxicities that negatively affect patient outcomes. This study aimed to test an approach for prospectively collecting patient-reported outcome (PRO) data, wearable sensor data (WSD), and clinical data, and develop a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict health care utilization, specifically urgent care (UC) visits.
Materials And Methods:
Patients with NSCLC completed the PROMIS-57 PRO quality-of-life measure and wore a Fitbit to monitor patient-generated health data from ST initiation through day 60. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. ML explainable models on the basis of Bayesian Networks (BNs) were used to develop predictive models for UC visits.
Results:
Patients in the training data set (N = 58) were age 69 years on average (range, 35-89) and mostly female (57%), White (88%), and non-Hispanic (95%) patients with adenocarcinoma (69%). Initial BN models trained on demographic and clinical data demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy on cross-validation for UC visits before ST (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.80]) and during ST (AUC, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89]). Incorporating PRO and WSD during ST yielded enhanced models with significantly improved performance (final AUC, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.95]) via DeLong test (P < .001).
Conclusion:
Multidimensional data sources, including demographic, clinical, PRO, and WSD, can enhance ML predictive models to elucidate complex, interactive factors influencing health care utilization during the first 60 days of ST. Use of explainable ML to predict and prevent treatment toxicities and health care utilization could improve patient outcomes and enhance the quality of cancer care delivery.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
03:08Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
Published on: October 3, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
