Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Strengthening next generation risk decision-making: A contemporary review
Yadvinder Bhuller1, Raywat Deonandan1, Daniel Krewski2
1Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
None:
Risk decision-making inherently requires consideration of fundamental principles and other factors pertinent for addressing important health and environmental risks of concern. The risk decision-making process has evolved from linear frameworks to more integrated and dynamic strategies. A recent scoping review mapped this evolution and demonstrated a transition to more holistic and complex approaches. The term next generation risk decision-making captures these contemporary strategies by incorporating all aspects of risk assessment, management, and communication involved in risk decision-making, thereby going beyond recently articulated next generation risk assessment frameworks. While this scoping review included best practices and ten attributes of risk decision-making, it did not address how to consider these factors when developing strategies for next generation risk decision-making. This contemporary review addresses this limitation by discussing the role of decision theories prior to presenting a model for characterizing, categorizing, and visualizing these ten considerations: foresight and planning, research and development, regulatory, risk, upstream and downstream attributes, risk culture, ONE Health lens, broad regulatory factors, risk management, and risk communication. The realist paradigm-based model and corresponding considerations are then analyzed using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of top-down, bottom-up, and fully integrated risk science strategies to next generation risk decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Relative Risk
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
