Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
An adaptive proton FLASH therapy using modularized pin ridge filter
Ahmal Jawad Zafar1, Xiaofeng Yang1, Zachary Diamond1
1Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Background:
In our previous study, we developed a modular pin ridge filter (pRF) design framework to streamline assembly, enabling the fast manufacture of custom filters optimized for single-energy proton FLASH planning.
Purpose:
In this paper, we propose a method to optimize adaptive proton FLASH therapy (ADP-FLASH) using modularized pRFs by recycling module pins from the initial plan while reducing pRF adjustments in adaptive FLASH planning.
Methods:
Initially, single energy (250 MeV) FLASH-pRF plans were created using pencil beam directions (PBDs) from initial IMPT plans on the planning CT (pCT). PBDs are classified as new/changed (ΔE > 5 MeV) or unchanged by comparing spot maps for targets between pCT and re-CT. We used an iterative least-square regression model to identify recyclable PBDs with minimal relative changes to spot MU weighting. Two PBDs with the least square error were retrieved per iteration and added to the background plan, and the remaining PBDs were reoptimized for the adaptive plan in subsequent iterations. The method was validated on three liver SBRT cases (50 Gy in five fractions) by comparing various dosimetric parameters across initial pRF plans on pCT, re-CT, and the ADP-FLASH-pRF plans on re-CT.
Results:
V100 for initial-pRF plans on pCT, re-CT, and ADP-FLASH-pRF plans for the three cases were as follows: (93.7%, 89.2%, 91.4%), (93.5%, 60.2%, 91.7%), and (97.3%, 69.9%, 98.8%). We observe a decline in plan quality when applying the initial pRF to the re-CT, whereas the ADP-FLASH-pRF approach restores quality comparable to the initial pRF on the pCT. FLASH effect of the initial pRF and ADP pRF plans were evaluated with a dose and dose rate threshold of 1 and 40 Gy/s, respectively, using the FLASH effectiveness model. The proposed method recycled 91.2%, 71%, and 64.7% of PBDs from initial pRF plans for the three cases while maintaining all clinical goals and preserving FLASH effects.
Conclusion:
This study validated a method for recycling the pRFs in single-energy proton FLASH planning for SBRT cases. This framework offers a scalable solution for adaptive proton therapy, balancing clinical effectiveness and practicality.
More Related Videos
08:43Advanced Cardiac Rhythm Management by Applying Optogenetic Multi-Site Photostimulation in Murine Hearts
Published on: August 26, 2021
08:06Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone
Published on: February 23, 2017