Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
Published on: May 16, 2017
Curiosity and surprise differentially affect memory depending on age
Alexandra Sobczak1, Tineke Steiger1, Marthe Mieling1
1Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Maria-Goeppert-Strasse 9a, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
State epistemic curiosity enhances long-term memory in adults, influenced by surprise, especially in younger individuals. Formal education also predicts curiosity, impacting lifelong learning.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Lifespan Development
Background:
- Epistemic curiosity, encompassing state and trait forms, influences cognition and behavior.
- Limited research exists on age-related changes, the role of surprise, and formal education's impact on epistemic curiosity.
- Understanding these factors is crucial for a comprehensive view of learning and knowledge acquisition across the lifespan.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of state and trait epistemic curiosity in long-term memory across different adult age groups.
- To examine the moderating effect of surprise on the relationship between epistemic curiosity and memory, considering age differences.
- To explore the predictive relationships between trait epistemic curiosity, formal education, and state epistemic curiosity.
Main Methods:
- Three behavioral experiments were conducted with a total of 331 participants (n=54, n=81, n=196).
- Participants' long-term memory for relevant information was assessed in relation to their state and trait epistemic curiosity levels.
- A mediation model was employed to analyze the interplay between trait curiosity, formal education, and state curiosity.
Main Results:
- State epistemic curiosity, not trait curiosity, significantly enhanced long-term memory in both young and older adults.
- Surprise modulated memory effects, with a stronger influence observed in younger adults, aligning with predictive coding and arousal theories.
- Trait epistemic curiosity directly predicted state curiosity, while formal education provided an indirect pathway.
Conclusions:
- State epistemic curiosity is a key driver of long-term memory across the adult lifespan.
- Age modulates the influence of surprise on curiosity-driven memory, potentially due to age-related changes in arousal processing.
- Formal education and trait curiosity interact to shape state curiosity, contributing to lifelong learning and knowledge acquisition.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Cognitive Development During Adulthood

