Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Predicting Absolute Risk of First Relapse in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma by Incorporating Contemporary Treatment
Shahin Roshani1, Flora E van Leeuwen1, Sara Rossetti2
1Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: There is a need for prediction models which enable weighing benefits against risks of different treatment strategies for individual Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. Therefore, we aimed to predict absolute risk of progression, first relapse or death (PRD) with and without incorporating HL treatment. Methods: The prognostic and treatment information of 2343 patients treated for classical HL at ages 15-60 years between 2008 and 2018 in the Netherlands was used to predict absolute risk of PRD up to 5 years after diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models allowing for time-varying coefficients. Models were externally validated in 1675 patients treated for classical HL in Denmark between 2000 and 2018. Results: In early stages, gender, leukocyte, and lymphocyte counts were associated with risk of PRD. Additionally, receiving >4 cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or ABVD plus radiotherapy predicted lower risk of relapse compared with receiving ≤4 cycles of ABVD. In advanced stages, age, albumin and leukocyte counts predicted PRD risk. Receiving (escalated) BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) predicted lower PRD risk compared to ABVD. In Danish patients treated between 2008 and 2018, adding treatment information improved 5-year Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) Area Under the Curve (AUC) values from 0.63 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.55-0.72) to 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79) in early stages (p-value = 0.04) and from 0.59 (95% CI: 0.52-0.65) to 0.62 (95% CI: 0.55-0.68) in advanced stages (p-value = 0.33). Conclusions: We developed well calibrated models with reasonable discrimination, not only incorporating pre-treatment prognostic factors but also treatment effect enabling the prediction of absolute risk of first relapse/progression.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Relative Risk
