Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
From Emails to EMR: Implementing I-PASS Among Inpatient Palliative Care Clinicians at a Comprehensive Cancer Center-A
Jaya Amaram-Davila1, Maria Franco Vega2, Patricia Bramati1
1Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Background:
Inpatient palliative care consultation services operate with an interdisciplinary team, where effective handoffs are crucial for coordinated patient care. We aimed to replace encrypted email handoffs with a more concise and uniform handoff using I-PASS (illness severity, patient summary, action list, situational awareness, contingency planning, and synthesis by receiver) integrated within the electronic medical record (EMR). Aim and Measures: Within six months of launch, our goal was to achieve 90% I-PASS utilization for hospitalized acutely ill patients with cancer receiving palliative care consultation.
Intervention:
In January 2021, our quality improvement team, consisting of physicians, advanced practice providers, and trainees, began implementing I-PASS using the plan-do-study-act cycle. After providing training sessions for all palliative care clinicians, I-PASS went live on October 1, 2021. I-PASS utilization was tracked via random and monthly audits of EMRs. Through anonymous surveys, both pre- and post-implementation, we gathered clinician feedback and concerns about the handoff system. Survey responses were compared using the Mann-Whitney test.
Outcomes:
Within six months of implementation, the I-PASS utilization rate reached > 99%. The survey participation rates were 70% (45/64) and 82% (49/60) for the pre-and post-implementation periods, respectively. Respondents provided answers on one to five scale (mean, standard deviation, SD): lower accuracy with email (3.53, SD = 0.98) vs. I-PASS (4.20, SD = 0.83), p < 0.001; handoff lengthier with email (4.17, SD = 1.05) vs. I-PASS (2.1, SD = 1.15), p < 0.001; the time required was longer with email (3.0, SD = 1.22) vs. I-PASS (1.71, SD = 0.73), p < 0.001. Overall, respondents found I-PASS to be significantly better (4.69, SD = 0.58).
Conclusion:
I-PASS was fully adopted by the team, with nearly 100% utilization and strong clinician endorsement as an effective communication tool. Future efforts should focus on optimizing usability, particularly by educating clinicians on smartphone EMR access and enabling the timely and streamlined editing of I-PASS.
More Related Videos
05:56Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
Published on: August 29, 2025
03:47Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Patient-centered Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment: