Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
A Permanent Window for Investigating Cancer Metastasis to the Lung
Published on: July 1, 2021
ESFT13: A Phase II Study Evaluating the Addition of Window and Maintenance Therapy to a Standard Chemotherapy
Jessica Gartrell1, Fariba Navid2, Xiaomeng Yuan3
1Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Study Aim:
Patients with high-risk Ewing sarcoma (ES) have dismal outcomes despite aggressive multimodal therapy. This phase II, single-institution study evaluated the response rate to two up-front cycles of irinotecan, temozolomide, and temsirolimus (ITT) and assessed the tolerability of maintenance therapy following standard treatment in high-risk ES.
Methods:
Eligible patients had newly diagnosed high-risk ES (age ≥14 years old, metastatic disease, or primary pelvic tumor). The therapy included two cycles of window therapy (ITT) followed by interval-compressed chemotherapy (vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide) and maintenance therapy (cyclophosphamide, sorafenib, and bevacizumab). A two-stage sequential design was employed to assess a >50% WHO response (CR or PR) with 80% power. Patients who required emergent radiation were excluded from receiving window therapy.
Results:
Sixteen patients (median age 12.2 years; range 4.8-23.6 years) were enrolled (12 evaluable for overall response, 10 for primary tumor response). Only three achieved a PR to window therapy, leading to study closure. All evaluable patients demonstrated a decline in their primary tumor volume (mean decline: 32.5%, standard deviation: 17.6%, p-value: 0.0005) and SUV peak (mean decline: 49.9%, standard deviation: 21.1%, p-value: 0.002). Maintenance therapy was well tolerated, with only 2/13 patients discontinuing due to toxicity.
Conclusions:
ITT did not achieve the prespecified response rate of 50%, according to WHO criteria; however, all patients exhibited decreased volume and metabolic activity, highlighting the limitations of conventional response assessments. Maintenance therapy was feasible and well tolerated. Although limited by small sample size, heterogeneous disease presentations, and the absence of a control arm, this study supports further evaluation of ITT and a maintenance approach in larger, randomized trials for high-risk ES.
