Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Explainable AI in Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Meta-Analysis of Methods, Applications, and Usability
Qaiser Abbas1, Woonyoung Jeong2, Seung Won Lee2,3,4,5,6
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
Explainable AI (XAI) in clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) improves diagnostics but faces adoption barriers. Research highlights the need for better evaluation, transparency, and ethical considerations for responsible AI in healthcare.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) enhances diagnostics, risk stratification, and treatment planning.
- Explainable AI (XAI) is crucial for overcoming barriers to clinical adoption of AI models.
- Current AI applications show promise but require further development for widespread clinical use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze the application and challenges of XAI methods in CDSSs.
- To identify current trends, gaps, and future directions in XAI for clinical decision support.
- To provide recommendations for responsible and clinically relevant AI implementation in healthcare.
Main Methods:
- Systematic meta-analysis of 62 peer-reviewed studies published between 2018 and 2025.
- Examination of XAI methods in diverse clinical domains: radiology, oncology, neurology, and critical care.
- Focus on model-agnostic techniques like Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and attention mechanisms.
Main Results:
- Model-agnostic XAI techniques are prevalent in imaging and sequential data tasks.
- Significant gaps exist in user-friendly evaluation, methodological transparency, and ethical considerations.
- Lack of research on explanation fidelity, clinician trust, and real-world usability was observed.
Conclusions:
- XAI in CDSSs is vital for advancing healthcare AI.
- Addressing gaps in validation, design, and interpretability is essential for responsible AI.
- Future AI solutions must be transparent, ethical, and clinically relevant for successful integration.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
