Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Systematic Review of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Evaluating Methodological Quality
Christine Maheu1, Wing Lam Tock2, Peter Fisher3
1Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montréal, QC H3A 2M7, Canada.
This study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures for fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), finding many reliable tools for survivors. The FCR-1, FCRI-SF, and FoP-Q-SF are recommended for clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Psychometric evaluation of health-related instruments.
- Cancer survivorship and psycho-oncology research.
- Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Background:
- Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) significantly impacts cancer survivors' psychological well-being and quality of life.
- A wide range of PROMs exist to assess FCR, but consensus on their validity and reliability is lacking.
- This study addresses the need for a systematic psychometric evaluation of contemporary FCR PROMs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of FCR PROMs developed or validated between 2011 and 2023.
- To apply the full COSMIN methodology for rigorous appraisal of measurement properties.
- To provide evidence-based guidance for selecting appropriate FCR PROMs in clinical and research settings.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review following COSMIN 10-step procedure and PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
- Searched six databases (Jan 2011–Dec 2023) for studies evaluating self-reported, Likert-scale FCR PROMs in adult cancer survivors.
- Appraised eight psychometric properties using COSMIN checklists, criteria for good measurement properties, and modified GRADE for evidence quality.
Main Results:
- 28 out of 34 evaluated PROMs achieved COSMIN Category A status, indicating sufficient psychometric quality.
- 15 of 19 cross-culturally validated FCRI and FoP-Q instruments received Category A, showing strong performance.
- The FCR-1 single-item PROM demonstrated responsiveness; FCR-1, FCRI-SF, FoP-Q-SF, FCR-7, and CWS are recommended for clinical use.
Conclusions:
- Significant progress has been made in developing valid, reliable, and culturally adaptable FCR PROMs.
- The FCRI, FoP-Q-SF, FCR7, CWS, and FCR-1 are strongly supported for clinical screening and longitudinal assessment.
- This review offers clear, evidence-based guidance for selecting FCR instruments in cancer survivorship care and research.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
