Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

07:59
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
1.6K
Tumor Cell Proportion Assessment in Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tissue Samples in Real-World
Kanako C Hatanaka1, Kazumi Nishino2, Tomoyuki Yokose3
1Center for Development of Advanced Diagnostics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 13, 2025
Summary
Accurate tumor cell proportion assessment is vital for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. An AI algorithm showed moderate agreement with a central pathology committee, suggesting potential utility in improving NSCLC diagnostics.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Accurate driver gene alteration identification is crucial for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment selection.
- Precise tumor cell proportion assessment is essential for reliable gene alteration detection in NSCLC.
- The ASTRAL study evaluated inter-rater agreement in tumor cell proportion assessments for advanced NSCLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the agreement in tumor cell proportion assessments among local pathologists, a Central Pathology Committee (CPC), and an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.
- To determine the reliability of AI in estimating tumor cell proportion compared to human expert assessments.
- To assess the clinical utility of AI in improving diagnostic accuracy for NSCLC.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational, multicenter study (ASTRAL) involving 204 advanced NSCLC patients.
- Tumor tissues assessed by local pathologists (H&E slides), CPC (digitized slides), and an AI algorithm (digitized slides).
- Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) used to measure agreement between raters.
Main Results:
- Poor to moderate agreement (ICC=0.588) between local pathologists and the CPC.
- Moderate agreement (ICC=0.652) between the AI algorithm and the CPC.
- Poor to moderate agreement (ICC=0.465) between the AI algorithm and local pathologists.
Conclusions:
- The AI algorithm demonstrated the highest numerical agreement with the CPC, indicating potential usefulness in clinical practice.
- Current agreement levels highlight the need for continued efforts to refine AI algorithms for accurate tumor cell proportion estimation.
- Integrating AI tools may enhance the consistency and accuracy of diagnostic assessments in real-world NSCLC management.

