Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Innovative Therapeutic Strategies for Hemorrhagic Shock Research
Published on: March 22, 2024
The Predictive Value of Clinical Signs to Identify Shock in Critically Ill Patients
Matthias Noitz1,2, Sabine Preining2, Dominik Jenny1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020 Linz and Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.
None:
Background/Objectives: Current guidelines recommend the use of clinical signs to diagnose shock and cellular hypoperfusion in critically ill patients. However, these recommendations are based on limited scientific evidence. The objective was to determine the predictive value of clinical signs to identify shock. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including adult (≥18 years) patients admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit of a tertiary hospital. The primary goal was to determine the predictive value of tachycardia, prolonged capillary refill time (CRT), skin mottling, weak radial pulse, inadequate peripheral perfusion, shock index > 0.8, altered mental state, and diaphoresis to identify shock. Two-by-two contingency tables were used for statistical analysis. Results: Three-hundred-seventeen patients (no shock, n = 231; shock, n = 86) were included. As a single clinical sign, skin mottling [sensitivity, 0.38; specificity, 0.92; negative likelihood ratio (LR-), 0.68; positive likelihood ratio (LR+), 4.62], prolonged CRT (sensitivity, 0.44; specificity, 0.89; LR-, 0.62; LR+, 4.17), shock index >0.8 [sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.64; LR-, 0.36; LR+, 2.15], a weak radial pulse [sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.79; LR-, 0.49; LR+, 2.88], and inadequate peripheral perfusion [sensitivity, 0.68; specificity, 0.73; LR-, 0.44; LR+, 2.52] predicted shock. Prolonged CRT, skin mottling, inadequate peripheral perfusion, a weak radial pulse, and a shock index >0.8 predicted shock states with low cardiac output. A shock index >0.8, tachycardia, and a weak radial pulse were predictive of distributive/vasodilatory shock. The accuracy to identify shock were higher if ≥2 clinical signs were present compared to only one. Conclusions: Skin mottling, prolonged CRT, shock index >0.8, weak radial pulse, and inadequate peripheral perfusion can identify patients with shock, particularly shock states with low cardiac output, with high specificity and LR+.
More Related Videos
07:51Standardized Hemorrhagic Shock Induction Guided by Cerebral Oximetry and Extended Hemodynamic Monitoring in Pigs
Published on: May 21, 2019
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...