Micro-Computed Tomography Assessment of Voids and Volume Changes in Bulk-Fill Restoration with Stamp Technique

The stamp technique with bulk-fill composites aims to enhance occlusal surface replication in Class I restorations. Limited research exists on its void formation and volumetric changes. This study measures internal and external voids as well as volumetric changes in occlusal surfaces for both the stamp and conventional bulk-fill techniques. Materials and methods: Twenty-four permanent molars were divided into two groups (n = 12 each): Group 1 (conventional bulk fill) and Group 2 (stamp technique with bulk-fill composite). Standardized Class I cavities were prepared and restored using Tetric EvoCeram^® Bulk Fill composite. Micro-CT scanning was performed before and after restoration to quantify internal and external void percentages and volumetric changes. An independent samples t-test (α = 0.05) was used to compare void percentages and volumetric changes between groups. Results: The mean internal void percentage was similar between groups (Group 1: 0.38 ± 0.22%; Group 2: 0.39 ± 0.30%; p = 0.914), indicating comparable internal adaptation. Group 2 showed a significantly higher external void percentage (17.59 ± 1.76%) compared to Group 1 (9.05 ± 1.98%; p < 0.001), attributed to the stamp technique's precise replication of occlusal micromorphology, misinterpreted as porosity by analysis software. Fractal dimension analysis revealed that the stamp technique resulted in the formation of a more complex structure. Restoration volumes (Group 1: 34.10 ± 8.09 mm³; Group 2: 35.52 ± 4.80 mm³; p = 0.639) and volumetric changes (Group 1: 5.91 ± 2.72 mm³; Group 2: 4.64 ± 1.31 mm³; p = 0.199) showed no significant differences. in conclusion, the stamp technique produced internal void percentages comparable to the conventional bulk-fill method in Class I restorations. The significantly higher external void percentage in the stamp technique group was due to the accurate replication of occlusal micromorphology, which was detected as porosity by analysis software. No significant differences were observed in volumetric changes of the occlusal surface before and after restoration between the two techniques, supporting the clinical viability of the stamp technique for precise occlusal restorations.