Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
Use of Principal Components for Scaling Up Topographic Models to Map Soil Redistribution and Soil Organic Carbon
Published on: October 16, 2018
A Comparative Assessment of Sentinel-2 and UAV-Based Imagery for Soil Organic Carbon Estimations Using Machine
Imad El-Jamaoui1, Maria José Martínez Sánchez1, Carmen Pérez Sirvent1
1Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Geology and Pedology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Abstract:
As the largest carbon reservoir in terrestrial ecosystems, soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle and climate change mitigation. A promising approach to swiftly procuring geographically dispersed SOC data is the amalgamation of UAV-based multispectral imagery at the local scale and Sentinel-2 satellite imagery at the regional scale. This integrated approach is particularly well-suited for precision agriculture and real-time monitoring. In this study, we evaluated the performance of UAVs and Sentinel-2 imagery in predicting SOC using four machine-learning models: Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). UAV imagery outperformed Sentinel-2, achieving more accurate detection of local SOC variability thanks to its finer spatial resolution (5-10 cm versus 10-20 m). Among the models tested, the Random Forest algorithm achieved the highest accuracy, with an R2 of up to 0.85 using UAV data and 0.65 using Sentinel-2 data, along with low RMSE values. All models confirmed the superiority of UAV imagery based on key error metrics (SSE, MSE, RMSE, and NSE). Although Sentinel-2 remains valuable for regional assessments, UAV imagery combined with Random Forest provides the most reliable SOC estimates at local scales. The spatial SOC maps generated from both UAV and Sentinel-2 imagery showed more nuanced spatial variability than standard interpolation techniques. While prediction accuracy using UAV-based models was slightly lower in some cases, UAV imagery provided greater spatial detail in SOC distribution. However, this is associated with higher acquisition and processing costs compared to freely available Sentinel-2 imagery. Given their respective advantages, we recommend using UAV imagery for detailed, site-specific SOC estimations and Sentinel-2 data for broader regional-to-global SOC mapping efforts.
