Role of Multiparametric Ultrasound in Predicting the IDH Mutation in Gliomas: Insights from Intraoperative B-Mode,...

Objectives: To investigate the correlation between intraoperative conventional ultrasound, SWE, and SMI ultrasound manifestations of glioma and the expression of immunohistochemical markers. Methods: Patients with single superficial supratentorial glioma scheduled for brain tumor resection in our neurosurgery department from October 2020 to October 2022 were prospectively included. High-grade glioma (HGG) and low-grade glioma (LGG) were classified by pathological histological grading, and the differences in conventional ultrasound, SWE Young's modulus, and SMI intratumoral and peritumoral blood flow architecture between HGG and LGG were analyzed, and the SWE diagnostic cut-off value was calculated by the Youdon index. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the independent predictive ultrasound signs associated with the diagnosis of HGG. HGG and LGG were classified by pathological histological grading. IDH1 expression was measured by immunohistochemical methods to analyze the correlation between IDH1 expression in glioma and clinical and ultrasound characteristics. Results: Forty-eight patients with glioma admitted to our hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were included in this study, including 30 (62.5%) with HGG and 18 (37.5%) with LGG. For conventional ultrasound, HGG was often associated with severe peritumoral edema compared with LGG (p = 0.048). The sensitivity of HGG was 88.9%, the specificity was 86.7%, and the AUC was 0.855 (95% confidence interval: 0.741-0.968, p = 0.001) using Young's mode 13.90 kPa as the threshold. Logistic analysis showed that SWE Young's modulus values, and peritumoral and intratumoral SMI blood flow structures, were associated with the diagnosis of HGG. Among the 48 gliomas, 22 (45.8%) were IDH1-positive and 26 (54.2%) were IDH1-negative, with no statistical difference in age between the two groups and a statistical difference in histological grading (p < 0.05). There was a statistical difference between IDH1 mutant and wild type in terms of peritumoral edema and SMI intratumoral and peritumoral tissue vascular architecture. Logistic regression models showed that intratumoral and peritumoral tissue SMI vascular architecture was a valid predictor of IDH1 positivity, with a classification accuracy of 81.3%, sensitivity of 90.9%, and specificity of 73.1%. Further group analysis of mutant Young's modulus values in LGG were higher than wild-type Young's modulus values (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Peritumoral and intratumoral tissue SMI vascular architecture was a valid predictor of IDH1 positivity. Based on intraoperative ultrasound multimodality images, we can preoperatively determine the expression of molecular markers of lesions, which is of clinical significance for optimizing surgical strategies and predicting prognosis.