Implementation of Evidence-Based Psychological Treatments to Address Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review

Background: The depressed population needs to be treated and they do not have access to evidenced-based psychological practices (EBPPs). The consequences lead to significant daily impairments and huge economical costs. A large amount of research has focused on the demand for a more extensive use of EBPPs. However, despite these practices being essential to the mental health system, EBPPs are poorly applied in clinical settings. This situation has led to the development of Implementation Research (IR), a scientific field that aims to address the challenge of translation and identify the factors involved in the implementation process. Several implementation studies have been carried out in the field of health. However, the evidence from implementation studies of psychological treatments addressing depression has not yet been summarized. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review to assess implementation studies that use EBPPs to address depression. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines, including implementation studies that applied EBPPs to address depressive disorders. The following databases were used: PubMed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers revised the studies to determine whether the eligibility criteria were met. Results: A total of 8797 studies were identified through database searches. After removing duplicates, a total of 3757 studies were screened based on titles and abstracts. Finally, 127 full-text articles were reviewed, yielding 31 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Conclusions: This review offers valuable insights into the current state of IR in the implementation of EBPPs for treating depressive disorders. It underlines the necessity for a standardized nomenclature for study designs within the realm of IR and emphasizes the potential of hybrid efficacy-implementation studies to help close the gap between research and clinical practice. Despite the challenges encountered, this review points to a positive outlook for the use of IR in clinical psychology. A gradual adoption of IR is likely to strengthen its role in psychology and support the development of more effective strategies for implementing evidence-based interventions in clinical settings.