Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Utilizing Functional Genomics Screening to Identify Potentially Novel Drug Targets in Cancer Cell Spheroid Cultures
Published on: December 26, 2016
Targeting FOXK2 in triple-negative breast cancer: Role of the P53/MCAS1/miR-211-5p regulatory axis
Zankai Wu1, Yanting Zhang2, Dandan Xiang3
1Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, 99# Zhangzhidong Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Abstract:
Forkhead box K2 (FOXK2) is over-expressed in several human malignancies, yet how it is regulated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remained unclear. We aimed to clarify whether FOXK2 drives TNBC progression, and elucidate the upstream molecular circuitry that controls FOXK2 abundance. FOXK2 mRNA and protein were quantified by qPCR and Western blot in 30 paired TNBC and adjacent tissues. Some assays assessed proliferation, migration and invasion after FOXK2 knockdown or overexpression. Bioinformatics predicted miR-211-5p targeting FOXK2 and lncRNA MCM3AP-AS1 (MCAS1) targeting miR-211-5p. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and dual-luciferase assays validated these interactions. RNA pulldown, mass spectrometry and ChIP identified p53 binding to the MCAS1 promoter. FOXK2 was upregulated in TNBC tissues as opposed to the para-carcinoma tissues. FOXK2 silencing significantly reduced proliferation, migration and invasion, whereas overexpression accelerated these phenotypes. Mechanistically, MCAS1 acts as a sponge for miR-211-5p, ultimately protecting its target gene FOXK2 from degradation. Furthermore, employing RNA pulldown, mass spectrometry, ChIP, and luciferase reporter assays, our studies revealed a direct interaction between P53 and the promoter of MCAS1. This interaction resulted in the suppression of MCAS1 transcription. Clinical samples from TNBC patients further confirmed a correlation between FOXK2 expression and tumor size, lymphatic involvement, as well as the expression level of Ki-67. Our findings unveil a novel P53/MCAS1/miR-211-5p/FOXK2 regulatory axis that dictates TNBC aggressiveness. FOXK2 may sever as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target in TNBC.
Insights
Forkhead box K2 (FOXK2) drives triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. A novel P53/MCM3AP-AS1/miR-211-5p pathway regulates FOXK2, offering potential therapeutic targets for TNBC.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- Forkhead box K2 (FOXK2) is overexpressed in human malignancies, but its regulation in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear.
- Understanding FOXK2's role and regulatory mechanisms in TNBC is crucial for developing targeted therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether FOXK2 drives TNBC progression.
- To elucidate the upstream molecular circuitry regulating FOXK2 abundance in TNBC.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative PCR and Western blot for FOXK2 expression in TNBC tissues.
- Functional assays (proliferation, migration, invasion) after FOXK2 manipulation.
- Bioinformatics, RNA immunoprecipitation, dual-luciferase, RNA pulldown, mass spectrometry, and ChIP assays to identify and validate molecular interactions.
Main Results:
- FOXK2 was significantly upregulated in TNBC tissues compared to adjacent tissues.
- FOXK2 knockdown inhibited, while overexpression accelerated, TNBC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.
- A regulatory axis involving P53, lncRNA MCM3AP-AS1 (MCAS1), miR-211-5p, and FOXK2 was identified, where P53 suppresses MCAS1, MCAS1 sponges miR-211-5p, and miR-211-5p targets FOXK2.
- Clinical data showed correlations between FOXK2 expression and TNBC tumor size, lymphatic involvement, and Ki-67 levels.
Conclusions:
- A novel P53/MCAS1/miR-211-5p/FOXK2 regulatory axis dictates TNBC aggressiveness.
- FOXK2 is a potential prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for TNBC.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Abnormal Proliferation
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

