Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Assessment of the Metabolic Effects of Isocaloric 2:1 Intermittent Fasting in Mice
Published on: November 27, 2019
Alternate-day fasting elicits larger changes in fat mass than time-restricted eating in adults without obesity - A
Nina Derron1, Andreas T Güntner2, Ines C Weber1
1Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), 8091 Zurich and University of Zurich (UZH), 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Background & Aims:
Intermittent fasting (IF) is a popular nutritional strategy for weight control and improved metabolic health, however it is unclear which type of intermittent fasting is most effective. This randomized trial directly compared short-term alternate-day fasting (ADF) and time-restricted eating (TRE) with controls in adults with overweight or a high normal weight. The aim was to compare the effects of ADF and TRE versus controls regarding whole-body fat mass loss, weight control and cardiometabolic health.
Methods:
In this 4-week, parallel-arm, randomized clinical trial (February 2021-May 2022), participants aged 18-40 years with a body mass index between 23 and 30 kg/m2 were assigned to ADF (alternating fasting and ad libitum eating days), to TRE (eating only between 12:00-20:00), or control (no change in eating times). The primary outcome was change in total fat volume (assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging). Secondary outcomes were subcutaneous and visceral fat mass, body weight, resting metabolic rate, biochemical markers, energy intake, activity energy expenditure and health-related quality of life.
Results:
Seventy-six participants (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 29.6 [5.6] years; body mass index, 25.8 [2.2] kg/m2; 34 [44 %] female) were randomized to ADF (n = 26), TRE (n = 26), or control (n = 24). Seventy-five participants completed the trial (25 in ADF, 26 in TRE, 24 in control). ADF led to a greater reduction in total fat volume than control (mean difference -1059.8 cm3, 95 % CI: -1380.0 cm3 to -739.6 cm3, p < 0.001) and TRE (-695.7 cm3, 95 % CI: -1013.9 to -377.6 cm3, p < 0.001). TRE also reduced total fat volume compared to control (-364.0 cm3, 95 % CI: -621.3 cm3 to -106.7 cm3, p = 0.007). Energy intake was reduced by 34 % [18 %] in ADF, 15 % [21 %] in TRE and 3 % [22 %] in control. ADF, but not TRE, reduced visceral fat mass, resting metabolic rate, triiodothyronine and non-HDL cholesterol compared to controls. Only ADF increased activity energy expenditure and health-related quality of life. No serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusions:
In this randomized clinical trial, ADF was more effective in reducing energy intake than TRE which has subsequent effects on fat mass and body weight. Only ADF improved several cardiometabolic risk factors.
Registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04732130; Unique identifier: NCT04732130.
More Related Videos
06:28A Chronic High-Intensity Interval Training and Diet-Induced Obesity Model to Maximize Exercise Effort and Induce Physiologic Changes in Rats
Published on: April 28, 2023
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Metabolic States of the Body: Fasting and Starvation
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients