Implementing a randomization consent to enable Trials within Cohorts in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study - A mixed-methods
Elias R Zehnder1, Christof Manuel Schönenberger1, Julia Hüllstrung1
1Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Implementing the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design in a large HIV cohort study proved feasible. A high acceptance rate for randomization consent was observed, demonstrating the potential of this efficient trial methodology.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Health Services Research
- Infectious Disease Epidemiology
Background:
- Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) offers a more efficient approach to conducting randomized trials by obtaining consent for future randomization within existing cohorts.
- Implementing TwiCs requires integrating a "randomization consent" into established cohort study protocols and procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the process of implementing the TwiCs design and randomization consent within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
- To evaluate participant acceptance, physician and stakeholder perspectives, and identify barriers and facilitators to TwiCs implementation.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach was employed, including analysis of cohort data, a cross-sectional survey of physicians, semistructured interviews with stakeholders, and observational data collection.
- Participant acceptance and declining rates for randomization consent were analyzed, alongside qualitative data on attitudes, barriers, and facilitators.
Main Results:
- Over 5000 participants were approached, with 57.9% accepting randomization consent, 13.8% declining, and 28.2% postponing their decision.
- Higher acceptance was associated with male sex, younger age, higher education, consistent physician care, and shorter participation time. Physicians and research staff had a positive perception of TwiCs.
- Key barriers included language, participant understanding, and time constraints, while well-trained staff and clinical integration facilitated implementation. Ethical concerns were minimal, though explicit consent was debated.
Conclusions:
- The TwiCs design and randomization consent are feasible to implement in large, existing cohort studies.
- Participant acceptance rates were high, indicating the viability of TwiCs for efficient clinical trial conduct in established cohorts.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
14:23A Restriction Enzyme Based Cloning Method to Assess the In vitro Replication Capacity of HIV-1 Subtype C Gag-MJ4 Chimeric Viruses
Published on: August 31, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
