Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Long-Term Glycemic Outcomes in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A 2-Year Real-World Analysis of Different Automated Insulin
Tim Lührs1, Olga Kordonouri1, Thekla von dem Berge1
1Diabetes Center, Children's Hospital AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany.
Insights
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems improve glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes, with noncalibration systems showing better long-term results. Initial benefits may decrease after the first year, requiring sustained management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Diabetes Technology
- Metabolic Disorders
Background:
- Type 1 diabetes management in children and adolescents often involves complex insulin regimens.
- Transitioning to automated insulin delivery (AID) systems aims to improve glycemic control and reduce the burden of diabetes management.
- Evaluating the long-term effectiveness of different AID systems is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess long-term glycemic control changes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes after switching to various AID systems.
- To compare the performance of calibration-requiring (Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G) versus noncalibration (Medtronic MiniMed™ 780G, Tandem Control-IQ) AID systems.
- To identify factors influencing glycemic control outcomes in this population over a 24-month period.
Main Methods:
- A monocentric retrospective study analyzed real-world data from 305 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CwD) transitioning to AID.
- Data from 12 to 24 months post-transition were evaluated, comparing HbA1c, time in range (TIR), mean glucose, and other glycemic metrics.
- Nonparametric tests and multiple linear regression were used to assess between-system differences and predictive factors for HbA1c.
Main Results:
- All AID systems significantly improved TIR, mean glucose, and glycemia risk index (GRI), and reduced time above and below range.
- Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased in the first year but returned towards baseline by the second year.
- Noncalibration systems demonstrated superior outcomes at 24 months, including lower HbA1c (7.4% vs. 7.8%), reduced insulin dose, and increased automated mode time compared to the 670G system.
Conclusions:
- Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems enhance glycemic control and reduce hypoglycemia in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.
- Noncalibration AID systems offer better long-term performance compared to calibration-requiring systems.
- Sustaining the initial glycemic benefits of AID beyond the first year necessitates further research into long-term management strategies.
Objective:
To evaluate long-term changes in glycemic control after switching from nonautomated insulin therapy to various automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CwD).
Research Design And Methods:
This monocentric retrospective study included CwD under 20 years of age previously treated with multiple daily injections, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, or predictive low glucose management systems. Real-world data from 12 to 24 months following transition to AID were analyzed. Systems included the calibration-requiring Medtronic MiniMed™ 670G and noncalibration systems Medtronic MiniMed™ 780G and Tandem Control-IQ. Outcomes assessed included hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), time in range (TIR), mean glucose, coefficient of variation, glycemia risk index (GRI), body mass index standardized deviation score, and total daily dose (TDD) of insulin. Nonparametric tests assessed between-system differences and longitudinal changes. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to investigate factors influencing HbA1c.
Results:
Among 305 CwD initiating AID between 2019 and 2022, 83 (27.2%) used 670G and 222 (72.8%) used noncalibration systems. Across all groups, AID use led to significant improvements in TIR, time above range (181-250 mg/dL), time below range (<54 mg/dL), mean glucose, and GRI (all P < 0.001). HbA1c declined during the first year but regressed toward baseline in the second year (P < 0.001). At 24 months, noncalibration systems outperformed the 670G, showing lower HbA1c (7.4% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.021), reduced TDD (0.78 vs. 0.85 IU/kg/day, P = 0.022), and greater time in automated mode (95% vs. 73%, P < 0.001). Baseline HbA1c, AID type, and age were significant predictors of 24-month HbA1c.
Conclusions:
AID systems improve key glycemic outcomes and reduce hypoglycemia compared with prior therapies. Noncalibration systems demonstrate superior performance over time. However, the initial HbA1c benefits wane after the first year, highlighting the need for strategies to sustain long-term metabolic improvements.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides

