Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

398
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
398
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

752
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
752
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

529
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
529
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

389
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
389
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

561
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
561
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

580
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
580

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Noncardiovascular Chronic Disease Burden by Housing Status.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Performance of PREVENT Cardiovascular Risk in Electronic Health Record-Based Clinical Practice.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Lifetime Adverse Pregnancy Outcome History and Cardiovascular Risk.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2026
Same author

Gradient Importance Learning for Incomplete Observations.

... International Conference on Learning Representations·2026
Same author

Criteria to Assess the Predictive and Clinical Utility of Novel Models, Biomarkers, and Tools for Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Circulation·2026
Same author

A federated learning framework for ethical dynamic treatment allocation across heterogeneous hospitals.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2026
Same journal

Controlled Molecule Generator for Optimizing Multiple Chemical Properties.

ACM CHIL 2021 : proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning : April 8-9, 2021, Virtual Event. ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (2021 : Online)·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.8K

Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations.

Paidamoyo Chapfuwa1, Serge Assaad1, Shuxi Zeng1

  • 1Duke University, USA.

ACM CHIL 2021 : Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning : April 8-9, 2021, Virtual Event. ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning (2021 : Online)
|September 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for counterfactual inference with survival outcomes, addressing limitations in current methods. The approach improves survival prediction and treatment effect estimation, especially when dealing with censored data.

Keywords:
causal survival analysiscounterfactual inferencehazard ratiorepresentation learningsurvival analysistime-to-event

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.8K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Counterfactual inference from observational data is crucial in various fields, including medicine and manufacturing.
  • Existing methods for counterfactual inference often struggle with survival outcomes, particularly when dealing with censored data.
  • Handling censored survival data requires specialized techniques to avoid biased estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a unified framework for counterfactual inference specifically designed for survival outcomes.
  • To develop a nonparametric hazard ratio metric for evaluating both average and individualized treatment effects.
  • To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference with survival outcomes.
  • Formulated a nonparametric hazard ratio metric for treatment effect evaluation.
  • Utilized real-world and novel semi-synthetic datasets for validation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework significantly outperforms competitive alternatives in survival-outcome prediction.
  • The approach demonstrates superior performance in treatment-effect estimation for survival data.
  • Experimental results validate the framework's ability to handle censored outcomes effectively.

Conclusions:

  • The novel framework provides a robust solution for counterfactual inference with survival data.
  • The nonparametric hazard ratio metric offers a valuable tool for assessing treatment effects.
  • This work advances the application of representation learning in biostatistics and related fields.