Risk factors for childhood falls in Ghana: A multi-center cross-sectional study

Jacob Solomon Idan1,2, Emmanuel Kweku Nakua1, Shadrach Mintah1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

PubMed

Insights

Childhood falls are a major concern in Ghana. Younger age, male gender, and higher guardian education are key risk factors for falls in children, informing targeted prevention strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Pediatrics
  • Injury Prevention

Background:

  • Childhood injuries, especially falls, are a significant public health issue in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs).
  • In 2021, an estimated 350,000 falls occurred among children globally, disproportionately affecting LMICs.
  • Ghana faces a substantial burden of childhood falls, necessitating research into specific risk factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the risk factors associated with falls among children in Ghana.
  • To identify demographic and socioeconomic determinants of fall-related injuries in a Ghanaian pediatric population.
  • To provide evidence for developing targeted interventions to reduce childhood falls in Ghana.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study utilizing data from four tertiary teaching hospitals in Ghana.
  • Inclusion of 1555 children under 18 years who presented with unintentional injuries between January 2017 and December 2020.
  • Application of generalized logistic regression to identify significant risk factors for falls.

Main Results:

  • Falls constituted 55% of all reported unintentional injuries among children.
  • Children aged 5-12 years (47%) and males (69%) were most affected by falls.
  • Younger age groups (infants, toddlers, preschoolers), being male, and higher guardian education level were significant risk factors for falls.

Conclusions:

  • Age, gender, and guardian's education level are significant risk factors for childhood falls in Ghana.
  • Findings highlight the need for tailored interventions to mitigate fall-related injuries in children.
  • The study offers valuable insights for public health strategies in Ghana and other LMICs facing similar challenges.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is: