Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

An In Vitro Adult Mouse Muscle-nerve Preparation for Studying the Firing Properties of Muscle Afferents
Published on: September 24, 2014
What is social constructionism about race? A reply to Hochman
Celso Neto1,2
1Egenis-Centre for the Study of the Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
None:
This paper reconceptualizes social constructionism about race (hereafter SCR). While SCR is considered a hegemonic view in philosophy and academia more broadly, Hochman (2022) argues that this hegemony is illusory. He identifies different versions of SCR in the literature, showing that race constructionists do not share a single, common view. For him, race constructionists are not even united in rejecting biological race realism, and the label "social constructionism about race" is so inclusive that it has become almost useless. I identify what is missing in Hochman's analysis, namely, the recognition that SCR is an investigative practice (Brigandt 2012; Brigandt and Love 2012; Neto 2020). This recognition demands shifting focus from what race constructionists claim to what they do. By operating this shift, I explain why SCR remains an alternative to biological race realism in a important and specific sense, and why the label "social constructionism about race" is still useful.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
The Role of Culture
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Social Foundations of Self I: Play and Game
Social Identity