Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

578
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
578
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.3K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.9K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.4K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.4K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.3K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A systematic review of the use of antiretroviral drugs to prevent HIV in neonates and infants.

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society·2026
Same author

Association between housing instability and HIV care outcomes among people with HIV in the United States.

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)·2026
Same author

Residential mobility and health among people with hiv: a scoping review.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same author

Uptake of HIV Self-testing Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Nigeria: A Secondary Observational Analysis of a Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Trial.

AIDS and behavior·2026
Same author

Incidence of frailty-related fracture among Medicaid beneficiaries living with HIV and cancer: A cohort study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.7K

Using Measurement Error Parameters From Validation Data.

Rachael K Ross1, Matthew P Fox2,3, Catherine R Lesko4

  • 1From the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 15, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Epidemiologic studies often face measurement error, which can bias results. This research clarifies how to transport measurement error parameters from validation data to target samples, ensuring accurate bias analysis in observational studies.

Keywords:
Information biasMeasurement errorTransportabilityValidation data

More Related Videos

Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates
10:35

Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.7K
Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates
10:35

Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Measurement error is a pervasive issue in epidemiologic research, potentially causing significant information bias.
  • Existing methods to address measurement error often rely on validation data to estimate measurement error parameters, such as sensitivity and specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the independence assumptions necessary for transporting measurement error parameters from validation data to target samples.
  • To clarify how these assumptions differ based on the form of the measurement error parameters.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the conditions under which measurement error parameters can be validly transported.
  • Graphical illustrations are used to clarify the assumptions and their implications.

Main Results:

  • The required independence assumption for transporting measurement error parameters varies depending on whether the true measure is conditioned on the imperfect measure or vice versa.
  • Diagrams effectively illustrate the conditions for valid parameter transport.

Conclusions:

  • This work provides essential tools for epidemiologists to address measurement error using validation data.
  • Understanding and applying these transportability assumptions are crucial for accurate bias analysis in applied epidemiologic research.