Comparison between the Fibrinogen Clauss Assay and the TEG6S Citrated Functional Fibrinogen in Cardiac Surgery

Terrence Alfred1, Luiz Guilherme Villares da Costa2, Christopher Harle1

  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada.

Insights

The TEG6s citrated functional fibrinogen (CFF) assay correlates well with the Clauss method pre-cardiac surgery but weakens during bypass. While faster, CFF alone cannot predict bleeding, necessitating further research for transfusion algorithms.

Area of Science:

  • Coagulation science
  • Transfusion medicine
  • Cardiac surgery

Background:

  • Fibrinogen is crucial for hemostasis.
  • Accurate intraoperative fibrinogen measurement aids clinical decisions.
  • The TEG6s citrated functional fibrinogen (CFF) assay offers rapid results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Evaluate the correlation between TEG6s CFF and Clauss fibrinogen assays during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
  • Assess the utility of CFF for intraoperative decision-making and bleeding prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective observational study at a tertiary academic center.
  • Twenty adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB.
  • Blood samples analyzed using TEG6s CFF and Clauss assays at baseline, during rewarming, and post-protamine.

Main Results:

  • Strong correlation between CFF and Clauss at baseline (p < 0.01), weakening during rewarming (p < 0.05).
  • TEG6s CFF assay showed significantly faster turnaround times than Clauss.
  • CFF values did not reliably predict major postoperative bleeding.

Conclusions:

  • TEG6s CFF correlates with Clauss pre-CPB but less so during and after CPB.
  • Faster CFF results suggest potential for real-time intraoperative guidance.
  • CFF alone is insufficient for predicting postoperative bleeding; further validation is needed.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos