Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Performance tests for the posterior chain: Comparison of three different assessment methods
Anna Gabriel1, Dominic Michael Rasp2, Andreas Konrad3
1Professorship for Conservative and Rehabilitative Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
The standing 90:20 Isometric Posterior Chain Test (IPCT) can substitute isokinetic hamstring strength tests. However, the Bunkie Test is not interchangeable with other posterior chain assessments, and limb asymmetry cannot be reliably detected by these tests.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Musculoskeletal Research
Background:
- Assessing posterior chain strength is crucial for athletic performance and injury prevention.
- Various tests exist, but their interchangeability and validity for evaluating posterior chain function remain debated.
- Isokinetic testing, the Bunkie Test, and the Isometric Posterior Chain Test (IPCT) are commonly used.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the validity and reliability of three posterior chain performance tests: isokinetic hamstring strength, Bunkie Test, and IPCT.
- To determine if these tests can be used interchangeably for assessing posterior chain strength and limb symmetry.
- To evaluate the cost- and time-effectiveness of each test.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 29 healthy participants (16 females, 13 males).
- Measurements included isokinetic hamstring strength at 60°/s, Bunkie Test performance, and standing 90:20 Isometric Posterior Chain Test (IPCT) performance.
- Statistical analysis was performed to assess agreement between the tests for strength and limb asymmetry.
Main Results:
- All three tests evaluate posterior chain function but differ in validity, reliability, objectivity, cost, and time.
- The IPCT demonstrated high agreement with isokinetic hamstring strength measurements.
- The Bunkie Test showed no significant interaction with isokinetic measurements or the IPCT.
- None of the tests showed agreement in detecting limb asymmetries.
Conclusions:
- The IPCT is a viable alternative to isokinetic testing for hamstring strength assessment.
- The Bunkie Test and IPCT are not interchangeable with isokinetic tests or each other for overall posterior chain assessment.
- These tests should be used complementarily rather than interchangeably, especially for assessing limb asymmetries.
- Limb asymmetry assessment should not rely solely on the IPCT or Bunkie Test for knee flexion strength.
More Related Videos
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
06:28Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Three-Winding Transformers
In the per-unit equivalent circuit of a grounded Y-Y three-phase...
Non-destructive Tests for Concrete Strength
Mechanical Characteristics of Steel
The tension test is fundamental for determining tensile strength. In this test, a steel specimen is stretched using a gripping device until it breaks. The data collected during this test are used to...
Comparison Tests
Methods to Assess Microbial Communities