Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
Published on: June 20, 2025
Sampling and Ranking of Protein Conformations Using Machine Learning Techniques Do Not Improve the Quality of Rigid
Roman Stratiichuk1,2, Roman Kyrylenko1, Ihor Koleiev1,3
1Receptor.AI Inc., 20-22 Wenlock Road, London N1 7GU, U.K.
Machine learning (ML) conformational sampling for rigid protein-protein docking rarely improves predictions. Current ML methods and scoring functions struggle to identify better-bound protein structures, highlighting limitations in existing workflows.
Area of Science:
- Computational Biology
- Structural Bioinformatics
- Machine Learning in Biochemistry
Background:
- Rigid docking is a primary method for predicting protein-protein interactions when experimental structures are unavailable.
- Protein structures in unbound (Apo) forms may differ substantially from their bound (Holo) states, impacting docking accuracy.
- Machine learning (ML) conformational sampling aims to generate functionally relevant protein structures closer to Holo forms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of ML-based conformational sampling in improving rigid protein-protein docking.
- To assess the performance of various scoring functions in prioritizing ML-generated conformations.
- To identify limitations in current ML-enhanced rigid docking workflows.
Main Methods:
- Conformation sampling of protein subunits in 30 complexes from the PINDER dataset using two ML techniques.
- Evaluation of docking performance with physics-based, data-based, and ML-based scoring functions.
- Comparison of ML-generated conformations against experimental unbound (Apo) and bound (Holo) structures.
Main Results:
- ML-based conformational sampling infrequently generated structures closer to Holo conformations than Apo structures.
- Existing scoring functions failed to correctly prioritize or rank the generated conformations.
- The study identified critical limitations in current ML-enhanced rigid protein-protein docking.
Conclusions:
- ML-enhanced rigid docking workflows face significant challenges.
- Further research is needed to develop novel approaches for conformational generation and scoring in protein-protein docking.
- Current ML techniques do not consistently improve upon traditional rigid docking methods using Apo structures.
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Protein Organization
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
Protein-protein Interfaces
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...

