Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed
Hossam Elbenawi1, Youmna Ayman2, Ahmed Hashim3
1Cardiovascular Medicine Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduces shocks and hospitalizations but does not impact mortality or VT recurrence compared to ICDs alone or with antiarrhythmic drugs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Interventions
Background:
- Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a significant cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
- Catheter ablation is used to manage VT, but its long-term efficacy in IHD patients requires further evaluation.
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing life-threatening arrhythmias in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of catheter ablation in reducing arrhythmic burden and improving outcomes for patients with IHD.
- To compare catheter ablation combined with ICD therapy against ICD-only therapy and ICD with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs).
Main Methods:
- A systematic meta-analysis was conducted, including seven studies with 1192 participants.
- Pairwise and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were performed.
- Trial Sequential Analyses were utilized to evaluate the certainty of evidence for various outcomes.
Main Results:
- VT ablation significantly reduced ICD shocks (RR=0.50) and showed trends toward reduced VT storm and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD alone.
- No significant differences in mortality or VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence were observed between VT ablation and ICD-only or ICD plus AADs.
- Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, indicating a need for more data on other endpoints.
Conclusions:
- Catheter ablation in IHD patients with ICDs effectively reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only therapy.
- VT ablation offers no significant advantage over combined ICD and AAD therapy regarding these outcomes.
- VT ablation does not influence overall mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF, with conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence established by TSA.
Background:
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a major contributor to sudden cardiac death among patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). While catheter ablation reduces the arrhythmic burden, the impact on long-term outcomes remains uncertain. We assess the efficacy of catheter ablation in patients with IHD.
Methods:
We performed a meta-analysis by systematically searching electronic databases from inception to April 2025. Pairwise, reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses and Trial Sequential analyses were conducted.
Results:
A total of seven studies (1192 participants) were included. Among patients with IHD with ICD, VT ablation was associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = [0.34-0.74]), a trend toward reduced VT storm (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.40-1.04], p = 0.07), and lower rates of cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = [0.53-1.01], p = 0.06) compared to ICD alone. However, no significant differences were observed when compared to patients receiving ICD plus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). VT ablation showed no significant impact on mortality or VT/VF recurrence compared to either ICD alone or ICD with AADs. Reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analysis for all-cause mortality showed no significant difference between VT ablation and AAD + ICD. Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while further data is required for other outcomes.
Conclusion:
Among patients with IHD with ICD, VT ablation reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only therapy, but offers no significant advantage over ICD combined with AADs. VT ablation does not impact overall mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF. Trial sequential analysis confirmed conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, while additional data is needed for other outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
