Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed

Hossam Elbenawi1, Youmna Ayman2, Ahmed Hashim3

  • 1Cardiovascular Medicine Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Insights

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduces shocks and hospitalizations but does not impact mortality or VT recurrence compared to ICDs alone or with antiarrhythmic drugs.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Medical Interventions

Background:

  • Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a significant cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
  • Catheter ablation is used to manage VT, but its long-term efficacy in IHD patients requires further evaluation.
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing life-threatening arrhythmias in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of catheter ablation in reducing arrhythmic burden and improving outcomes for patients with IHD.
  • To compare catheter ablation combined with ICD therapy against ICD-only therapy and ICD with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs).

Main Methods:

  • A systematic meta-analysis was conducted, including seven studies with 1192 participants.
  • Pairwise and reconstructed time-to-event data meta-analyses were performed.
  • Trial Sequential Analyses were utilized to evaluate the certainty of evidence for various outcomes.

Main Results:

  • VT ablation significantly reduced ICD shocks (RR=0.50) and showed trends toward reduced VT storm and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD alone.
  • No significant differences in mortality or VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence were observed between VT ablation and ICD-only or ICD plus AADs.
  • Trial Sequential Analysis provided conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence, indicating a need for more data on other endpoints.

Conclusions:

  • Catheter ablation in IHD patients with ICDs effectively reduces ICD shocks, VT storm, and cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to ICD-only therapy.
  • VT ablation offers no significant advantage over combined ICD and AAD therapy regarding these outcomes.
  • VT ablation does not influence overall mortality or the recurrence of VT/VF, with conclusive evidence for VT/VF recurrence established by TSA.
Abstract