Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

51.7K
Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break...
51.7K
An Introduction to Free Energy01:05

An Introduction to Free Energy

10.8K
How can we compare the energy that releases from one reaction to that of another reaction? We use a measurement of free energy to quantitate these energy transfers. Scientists call this free energy Gibbs free energy (abbreviated with the letter G) after Josiah Willard Gibbs, the scientist who developed the measurement. According to the second law of thermodynamics, all energy transfers involve losing some energy in an unusable form such as heat, resulting in entropy. Gibbs free energy...
10.8K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

292
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
292
Work and Energy for Variable Forces01:10

Work and Energy for Variable Forces

5.6K
When an object is acted upon by a variable force, the amount of work done and the change in energy of the object can be more complex to calculate compared to when a constant force is applied. Work is the product of force and displacement, while energy is the capacity of a system to do work. When a constant force is applied to an object, the work done can be calculated as the product of the force and the distance moved in the direction of the force. However, when a variable force is applied, the...
5.6K
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

24.7K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
24.7K
Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States03:25

Free Energy Changes for Nonstandard States

13.4K
The free energy change for a process taking place with reactants and products present under nonstandard conditions (pressures other than 1 bar; concentrations other than 1 M) is related to the standard free energy change according to this equation:
13.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of Indole-3-yl-methylene-thiobarbital Derivatives as Inhibitors of HDAC8 Enzyme Activity.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

A Structure-Based Platform for Predicting Chemical-Induced Parkinson's Disease.

Chemical research in toxicology·2026
Same author

Doing More with Less: Accurate and Scalable Ligand Free Energy Calculations by Focusing on the Binding Site.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Accurate predictions of protein mutational effects accelerated with a hybrid-topology free energy protocol.

Communications chemistry·2025
Same author

Combining AlphaFold with Focused Virtual Library Design in the Development of Novel CCR2 and CCR5 Antagonists.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

In Search of Beautiful Molecules: A Perspective on Generative Modeling for Drug Design.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K

Integrating Machine Learning into Free Energy Perturbation Workflows.

Donald J M van Pinxteren1, Willem Jespers1

  • 1Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Photopharmacology and Imaging, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|September 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning (ML) enhances free energy perturbation (FEP) methods for drug design by improving efficiency and accuracy. Integrating ML, deep learning (DL), and active learning (AL) accelerates protein-ligand binding affinity predictions.

More Related Videos

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

615
Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K
Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization
05:37

Rapid in-silico Battery Electrolyte Electrochemical Reaction Generation using 3T-VASP Multi-Scale Energy Minimization

Published on: August 22, 2025

615
Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation
13:04

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Machine learning in science

Background:

  • Free energy perturbation (FEP) is a highly accurate method for predicting protein-ligand binding affinities in structure-based drug design.
  • However, FEP's widespread adoption is hindered by significant computational costs and complex implementation requirements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • This review explores the integration of machine learning (ML), including active learning (AL) and deep learning (DL), to enhance FEP workflows.
  • The goal is to improve the efficiency, accessibility, accuracy, and precision of FEP applications in drug discovery.

Main Methods:

  • The review examines ML applications in three key FEP areas: sampling strategies, protocol optimization, and force field development.
  • Active learning (AL) guides molecule selection to reduce FEP calculations in virtual screening.
  • Deep learning (DL) models like AlphaFold automate accurate protein-ligand complex structure generation for FEP.

Main Results:

  • ML integration significantly reduces the computational burden and complexity associated with FEP calculations.
  • Deep learning (DL) methods streamline the generation of accurate protein-ligand complex structures, bypassing traditional docking.
  • ML-derived neural network potentials (NNPs) offer enhanced force field accuracy, albeit with increased computational demands.

Conclusions:

  • A hybrid approach combining human expertise with ML tools is the most effective strategy for accelerating FEP-based drug discovery.
  • Future interdisciplinary developments in ML and FEP will broaden the impact of computer-aided drug design in pharmaceuticals and materials science.