Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Fruit Volatile Analysis Using an Electronic Nose
Published on: March 30, 2012
Utility of Volatile Organic Compounds and Electronic Nose Technology for Breast Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review
Fernanda M Orduña-Medina1, Lorena Díaz de León-Martinez2, Grecia D D Alarcón-Rivera3
1Medical Intern of Social Service, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis, Lomas los Filtros, San Luis Potosí, C.P. 78210, Mexico.
None:
Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality in women worldwide, primarily due to challenges in early detection and limited access to timely treatment. While mammography is widely used, it may produce false positives and lead to overdiagnosis. Recent advancements suggest that electronic nose technology, based on the detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), may offer a complementary non-invasive approach to breast cancer screening. This systematic review evaluates current detection methods and explores the feasibility and diagnostic value of the electronic nose, assessing its integration into existing clinical strategies.
Study Design:
A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria:
Seventy-six original articles were included, alongside data from eight additional studies. Eligible studies were published in English or Spanish, evaluated VOCs as a breast cancer screening method, and reported identified VOCs. Systematic reviews, duplicates, editorials, and articles without full-text access were excluded. Information sources and search strategy: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and Science Direct between September and October 2024. Keywords included: volatile organic compounds, breath biomarkers, volatolomics, breast cancer, breast carcinoma, screening, detection, and electronic nose. A total of 581 articles were retrieved: 64 from PubMed, 44 from Web of Science, 152 from Wiley, and 321 from Science Direct.
Study Selection:
Zotero was used for reference management and duplicate removal. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts; eligible full texts were reviewed, and discrepancies resolved by consensus.
Data Extraction:
A standardized form was used to collect author, publication year, population, intervention, comparator, main results, and analysis-relevant data. Three reviewers performed the extraction independently.
More Related Videos
09:19Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction
Published on: June 1, 2022
08:27Detection of Human Leukocyte Antigen Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Utilizing Label-free Biosensor Technology
Published on: March 24, 2015