Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray01:20

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray

466
The most common cardiovascular diagnostic test is an X-ray. It produces images of the heart, blood vessels, and adjacent structures.
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
466
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

1.1K
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
1.1K
X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

9.9K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
9.9K
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan01:30

Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan

536
Description
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
536
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

802
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
802
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging01:19

Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging

312
DefinitionRenal angiography, also known as renal arteriography, is an imaging technique used to obtain a comprehensive view of blood flow and the vascular structure of blood vessels in the kidneys and surrounding areas.PurposeRenal angiography detects blood vessel abnormalities in the kidneys, such as aneurysms, stenosis, thrombosis, vascular tumors, and renal artery stenosis. It evaluates kidney function and guides interventional treatments like angioplasty or stent placement.Pre-Procedure...
312

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient and Facility Factors Associated with Uptake of NTAP-Billed AI to Identify Suspected LVO in Ischemic Stroke.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Trends in the Concentration of Interventional Radiology Work Among Radiologists in the United States: Analysis of Medicare Claims Data, 2008-2023.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2026
Same author

National Turnaround Time Trends for Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries, 2014-2023.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Radiologist Turnover in the United States.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Association of Interventional Radiologist Clinical Evaluation and Management Services and Procedural Complexity.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2025
Same author

State-Level Malpractice Factors and Imaging Utilization in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Headache: A National Medicaid Analysis.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K

Repeat Imaging Rates for Office-Based Imaging Studies Interpreted by Nonphysician Practitioners Compared With

Eric W Christensen1, Alexandra R Drake2, Stella K Kang3

  • 1Research Director, Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
|September 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Repeat imaging studies are more common when interpreted by a nonphysician practitioner (NPP) compared to a radiologist, potentially leading to unnecessary care. This finding highlights the importance of careful interpretation in medical imaging.

Keywords:
NPPsreimagingrepeat imagingunnecessary care

More Related Videos

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

813
A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
09:49

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods

Published on: April 24, 2020

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.7K
Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

813
A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
09:49

A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods

Published on: April 24, 2020

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Differences in imaging interpretation can lead to variations in patient care and resource utilization.
  • Assessing repeat imaging rates is crucial for identifying potential inefficiencies and unnecessary healthcare expenditures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the rates of repeat imaging within 90 days between studies interpreted by nonphysician practitioners (NPPs) and radiologists.
  • To investigate whether the interpreter type influences the likelihood of repeat imaging across different modalities and anatomic regions.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 2013-2022 was conducted.
  • Imaging studies (radiography, ultrasound, MRI) with at least 30 repeat studies within 90 days were included.
  • Logistic regression adjusted for patient and community factors was used to compare repeat imaging likelihood.

Main Results:

  • Over 1.39 million imaging studies were analyzed, with 12.5% undergoing repeat imaging.
  • Repeat imaging rates were consistently higher for NPP-interpreted studies across radiography, ultrasound, and MRI.
  • Adjusted odds ratios for repeat imaging were significantly higher for NPP interpretations, ranging from 1.35 for radiography to 2.56 for MRI.

Conclusions:

  • Imaging studies interpreted by NPPs demonstrate a higher likelihood of repeat imaging compared to those interpreted by radiologists.
  • These findings suggest potential for excess reimaging, raising concerns about unnecessary healthcare utilization and costs.
  • The study underscores the need for standardized interpretation protocols and quality oversight in medical imaging.