Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Why prefer all-suture anchor? A new comprehensive evaluation method
Xucan Lian1,2, Yang Zhao3, Yong Huan1,2,4
1Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics (LNM), Beijing, China.
None:
All-suture anchor (ASA) is an emerging suture anchor used to fix soft tissue to bone. Composed entirely of textile material, ASA has the advantage of a small size and less damage to the bone. The purpose of this study was to analyze the mechanism of the pullout process of ASA from bone tissue and to quantitatively compare the extent of damage to cancellous bone by ASA and conventional suture anchors. First, pullout experiments were conducted on ASA in two different synthetic bone blocks to verify the effect of bone density on ASA performance, and the extraction process of ASA in the bone was simulated. In addition, a model of the proximal humerus was created, and different suture anchors were implanted. The damage to cancellous bone caused by the suture anchors was calculated and compared under the same force of 0-150 N and cyclic force of 0-100 N. The results showed that when the force was 150 N, the volume of plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 26% larger than that after ASA implantation. The maximum plastic strain after implantation of conventional suture anchors was 1.5 times greater than that after implantation of ASA. Finally, a comprehensive evaluation method of suture anchor performance based on overall stiffness was proposed. According to this evaluation method, the performance of ASA is superior to that of conventional suture anchors.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...
Nursing Evaluation
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

