Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

07:57
An Experimental Human DIEP Flap Model to Investigate Preservation Strategies for Vascularized Composite Allografts and Free Flaps
Published on: December 5, 2025
201
Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap
Jacquelyn Roth1, Maxwell Godek1, Ethan Fung1
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
|September 17, 2025
Summary
Robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (R-DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is suitable for many patients. A significant proportion have suitable perforator anatomy, particularly with more liberal eligibility criteria.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
- Breast Reconstruction
Background:
- Traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction can lead to abdominal wall morbidity.
- Robotic-assisted DIEP (R-DIEP) aims to minimize this by reducing fascial incision length.
- Identifying optimal candidates for R-DIEP requires understanding perforator anatomy, specifically diameter and intramuscular course length.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the proportion of patients anatomically eligible for robotic-assisted deep inferior epigastric perforator (R-DIEP) breast reconstruction.
- To quantify the prevalence of suitable perforator characteristics for R-DIEP.
- To evaluate eligibility using both conservative and liberal intramuscular course criteria.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 287 patients undergoing magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) perforator mapping before DIEP flap breast reconstruction (2019-2023).
- Analysis of dominant perforator diameter (>2mm) and intramuscular course length (≤2.5cm for conservative, ≤5cm for liberal criteria).
- Calculation of perforator intramuscular course length based on MRA data.
Main Results:
- Out of 574 dominant perforators, 29% had a course ≤2.5cm and 77% had a course ≤5cm.
- 46% of patients met conservative criteria (≤2.5cm course), while 93% met liberal criteria (≤5cm course).
- When considering perforator diameter >2mm, 31% met the conservative criteria and 49% met the liberal criteria.
Conclusions:
- A substantial percentage of patients are anatomically eligible for R-DIEP breast reconstruction.
- Eligibility significantly increases when more liberal intramuscular course criteria (≤5cm) are applied.
- These findings support the broader application of R-DIEP in breast reconstruction.

