Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

13.6K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
13.6K
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

841
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
841
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

841
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
841
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

460
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
460
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scaling Up Bayesian Neural Networks with Neural Networks.

Transactions on machine learning research·2026
Same author

Longitudinal Analysis of Peripheral MicroRNA Expression and Depressive Symptom Severity Change in a Community Cohort.

Epigenomes·2026
Same author

Statistics and AI - A Fireside Conversation.

Harvard data science review·2026
Same author

A Bayesian Time-Varying Psychophysiological Interaction Model.

Data science in science·2026
Same author

Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.

Data science in science·2026
Same author

A HORSESHOE MIXTURE MODEL FOR BAYESIAN SCREENING WITH AN APPLICATION TO LIGHT SHEET FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY IN BRAIN IMAGING.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same journal

Towards a Unified Theory for Semiparametric Data Fusion with Individual-Level Data.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

One-Step Estimation of Differentiable Hilbert-Valued Parameters.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

GENERALIZATION ERROR BOUNDS OF DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES IN PENALIZED REGRESSION-BASED LEARNING.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

EFFICIENT AND MULTIPLY ROBUST RISK ESTIMATION UNDER GENERAL FORMS OF DATASET SHIFT.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

TESTING HIGH-DIMENSIONAL REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS IN LINEAR MODELS.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same journal

COUNTERFACTUAL INFERENCE IN SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENTS.

Annals of statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FOR INDIVIDUAL OPTIMAL POLICY FROM HETEROGENEOUS DATA.

By Rui Miao1, Babak Shahbaba2, Annie Qu2

  • 1National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Annals of Statistics
|September 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for individualized offline reinforcement learning (RL) using heterogeneous data. The Penalized Pessimistic Personalized Policy Learning (P4L) algorithm optimizes policies for diverse populations, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
90C4091B69Dynamic treatment regimeHeterogenous dataMarkov decision processPrecision learningPrimary 62C20

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Offline reinforcement learning (RL) seeks optimal policies from pre-collected data.
  • Learning from heterogeneous data is a key challenge in offline RL.
  • Existing methods often yield suboptimal policies for heterogeneous populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an individualized offline policy optimization framework for heterogeneous time-stationary Markov decision processes (MDPs).
  • To address the limitations of traditional methods in handling diverse population data.
  • To develop an algorithm that efficiently estimates individual Q-functions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a heterogeneous model with individual latent variables.
  • Introduced the Penalized Pessimistic Personalized Policy Learning (P4L) algorithm.
  • Guaranteed a fast rate on average regret under partial coverage assumptions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed framework efficiently estimates individual Q-functions.
  • The P4L algorithm demonstrates superior numerical performance in simulations and real-world applications.
  • Achieved better policy optimization for heterogeneous populations compared to existing methods.

Conclusions:

  • The individualized offline policy optimization framework effectively handles heterogeneous data in MDPs.
  • The P4L algorithm offers a robust solution for personalized policy learning.
  • The study highlights the importance of individualized approaches in offline RL for diverse populations.