PEStimate: Predicting offspring disease risk after Polygenic Embryo Screening

Liraz Klausner1, Ateret Revital1, Todd Lencz2,3,4,5

  • 1Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Insights

Polygenic embryo screening (PES) can estimate offspring disease risk, but new models show potential risk reductions may be overestimated. The PEStimate app helps evaluate the impact of PES, considering factors like implantation failure.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive medicine and genetics
  • Epidemiological modeling and biostatistics
  • Bioinformatics and computational biology

Background:

  • Polygenic embryo screening (PES) aims to reduce offspring genetic risk for complex diseases by selecting in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos with lower genetic predisposition.
  • Current PES outcome prediction relies on epidemiological models, often complex and requiring advanced computation, and previously did not account for implantation failure.
  • Accurate estimation of PES effectiveness is crucial for informed decision-making by healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present PEStimate, a novel online application for predicting the outcomes of polygenic embryo screening for single-disease risk.
  • To introduce an updated epidemiological model for PES that incorporates the possibility of embryo implantation failure, addressing a limitation in previous models.
  • To provide a user-friendly tool for exploring the impact of various parameters on PES efficacy and potential risk reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new epidemiological model for PES that includes embryo implantation failure.
  • Creation of PEStimate, a freely accessible online application (shiny app) implementing the new model.
  • Inclusion of adjustable parameters in PEStimate, such as number of embryos, live birth rate, disease prevalence, heritability, genetic predictor accuracy, selection method, and parental genetic information.

Main Results:

  • The study's updated model indicates that previous overestimations of risk reduction associated with PES may have occurred.
  • PEStimate provides predictions of offspring disease risk both with and without PES, alongside visualizations of risk reduction.
  • The application allows users to explore the sensitivity of PES outcomes to various genetic and reproductive parameters.

Conclusions:

  • PEStimate offers a valuable, accessible tool for stakeholders to empirically examine the potential benefits and harms of polygenic embryo screening.
  • The inclusion of implantation failure in PES modeling suggests a need for revised expectations regarding the magnitude of disease risk reduction.
  • This tool facilitates informed discussions on the clinical utility and societal implications of advanced reproductive genetic technologies like PES.
Abstract