Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Role of DECT-Based Imaging Biomarkers and Machine Learning to Predict Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes
Neha Baijal1, Amit Gupta1, Sanil Garg1
1Department of Radio-Diagnosis and Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to assess and compare dual-energy CT (DECT) based quantitative parameters to differentiate between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC.
Materials And Methods:
This was a retrospective study including RCC patients who underwent DECT prior to surgery between January 2017 and December 2022. Two DECT parameters-iodine concentration (IC) and iodine ratio (IR)-were measured by two independent readers who manually drew circular regions of interest on the most enhancing part of the tumor. Inter-reader agreement was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Machine learning (ML) models trained to classify the histologic subtype as ccRCC and non-ccRCC, and grade of ccRCC as low or high, were evaluated for their accuracy.
Results:
A total of 112 patients (mean age: 65 years; male:female: 61:51), with 87 ccRCCs and 25 non-ccRCCs, were included. There was good inter-reader agreement for both IC and IR with a Pearson coefficient of 0.89. The individual DECT parameters had an accuracy of 77.7% (IC) and 77.5% (IR) for distinguishing ccRCC and non-ccRCC. Random Forest classifier and AdaBoost were the best ML models with an accuracy of 89.2% each. When ML algorithms were combined, the performance was improved, with AdaBoost performing the best with an accuracy of 100%. To distinguish low- and high-grade ccRCCs, IC and IR had an accuracy of 77.9 and 77.6%, respectively, while the ML models all did equally well with an accuracy of 77.6%. Combining ML algorithms again led to improved performance, with AdaBoost being the best overall ML model.
Conclusion:
DECT-based quantitative imaging biomarkers have moderate diagnostic accuracy, which can be greatly improved using ML to differentiate between ccRCC and non-ccRCC and predict the grade of ccRCC.
More Related Videos
09:16Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
Published on: June 18, 2020
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018