Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

599
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
599

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure-Guided Optimization of Novel Inhibitors of <i>Plasmodium</i> Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase with Multistage Activity against Malaria Parasites.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus often spreads from hospitalized patients into the local environment and less often spreads from the environment into patients.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2026
Same author

End-to-end evaluation of pipelines for metagenome-assembled genomes reveals hidden performance gaps.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Blood Pressure Genetic Risk and Incident Hypertension at 2 to 7 Years Post Partum.

JAMA cardiology·2026
Same author

Collateral hypersensitivity between ZY19489 and piperaquine neutralizes PfCRT-mediated drug efflux and Plasmodium falciparum resistance.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Prevalence and activity of class II microcins in <i>Serratia marcescens</i> strains by isolation source.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same journal

Layered social competition coordinates reproductive hierarchy formation in ants.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Combination epigenetic-targeted therapy increases the immunogenicity of poorly immunogenic sarcomas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Loss of LanC-like proteins delays post-injury regeneration of aging skeletal muscles.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Integrative Transfer Network: Deep Transfer Learning Across Populations and Prediction Targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Confidence-supported label-free metabolic imaging with FPhaS phase autofluorescence microscopy.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Sequence-encoded autoinhibition couples mRNA decapping activity to phase separation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.4K

Identification of Sample Processing Errors in Microbiome Studies Using Host Genetic Profiles.

Julia Urban1, Aya Brown Kav1, William F Kindschuh1

  • 1Program for Mathematical Genomics, Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|September 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microbiome study errors are common. New methods using host DNA analysis via metagenomic sequencing can detect mislabeled samples, improving data accuracy and reliability.

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.1K
A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples
09:09

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples

Published on: March 23, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing
07:21

Tick Microbiome Characterization by Next-Generation 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing

Published on: August 25, 2018

13.4K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.1K
A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples
09:09

A Method for Targeted 16S Sequencing of Human Milk Samples

Published on: March 23, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Sample processing errors are frequent and hard to detect in large-scale microbiome studies.
  • These errors can compromise the integrity and reliability of research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present two novel, complementary methods for identifying sample processing errors in microbiome studies.
  • To enhance the accuracy and trustworthiness of microbiome data through robust error detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing host DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) inferred from metagenomic sequencing.
  • Comparing metagenomics-inferred SNPs with external genotyping data (e.g., microarrays) for sample-donor matching.
  • Comparing metagenomics-inferred SNPs between samples to identify samples from the same donor.
  • Integrating these methods with experimental metadata for increased confidence in error identification.

Main Results:

  • Successfully identified mislabeled samples in a longitudinal vaginal microbiome dataset.
  • Demonstrated the robustness of the methods even with low sequencing coverage through subsampling.
  • Highlighted the significant frequency of processing errors in microbiome research.

Conclusions:

  • The presented host DNA-based methods are effective for detecting sample processing errors in microbiome studies.
  • Combining SNP comparison with metadata analysis provides a powerful approach for quality control.
  • Recommends implementing these error-detection strategies in microbiome research to ensure data integrity.