Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders
Jin-Hong Du1,2, Larry Wasserman1,2, Kathryn Roeder1,3
1Department of Statistics and Data Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
This study introduces a new statistical framework to address bias in large-scale hypothesis testing for genomic studies caused by unmeasured confounding effects. The method effectively controls errors and improves power in identifying differentially expressed genes.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Statistical Genetics
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Genomic studies often involve tens of thousands of simultaneous hypothesis tests to identify differentially expressed genes.
- Standard statistical approaches can be substantially biased due to unmeasured confounding effects.
- Accurate statistical inference is crucial for reliable identification of gene expression differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a unified statistical framework for large-scale hypothesis testing in multivariate generalized linear models with confounding effects.
- To address the challenge of unmeasured confounders in genomic data analysis.
- To improve the accuracy and power of identifying differentially expressed genes.
Main Methods:
- A novel framework using orthogonal structures and linear projections is proposed.
- The method disentangles confounding effects, jointly estimates latent factors and primary effects via lasso-type optimization.
- Bias-correction steps are incorporated for hypothesis testing, with theoretical guarantees on identification and error bounds.
Main Results:
- The proposed method demonstrates effective Type-I error control for asymptotic z-tests.
- Numerical experiments show the method controls the false discovery rate and offers increased power compared to alternatives.
- Application to single-cell RNA-seq data validates its suitability for adjusting confounding effects, even without explicit covariates.
Conclusions:
- The developed statistical framework provides a robust solution for hypothesis testing in the presence of arbitrary confounding mechanisms.
- The method enhances the reliability of findings in large-scale genomic studies.
- It offers a practical approach for adjusting confounding effects in complex biological data.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

