Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.8K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.8K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

349
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
349
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.9K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.3K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accurate density functional theory for noncovalent interactions in charged systems.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Development of Local Natural Orbital Arbitrary Order Coupled Cluster Methods and Assessment through Connected Quadruples.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same author

One-Pot Amidation/C─H Halogenation by an Efficient Electrochemical Cascade.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Systematically Improvable and Locality Accelerated Enzymatic Reactivity Modeling: Toward Chemical Accuracy at Affordable Cost.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A Linear-Scaling Integral-Direct Explicitly Correlated Second-Order Møller-Plesset Approach.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Hybrid DFT Quality Thermochemistry and Environment Effects at GGA Cost via Local Quantum Embedding.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.5K

Understanding DFT Uncertainties for More Reliable Reactivity Predictions by Advancing the Analysis of Error Sources.

Gergely Laczkó1,2, Imre Pápai1, Péter R Nagy3,4,5

  • 1Institute of Organic Chemistry, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok Körútja 2, Budapest H-1117, Hungary.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|September 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Density functional theory (DFT) methods show reliable predictions in main group chemistry. This study analyzes unexpected DFT disagreements, revealing methods to improve accuracy for organic reactions and other chemical studies.

More Related Videos

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
14:11

Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis

Published on: March 29, 2016

27.5K
Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
12:11

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry

Published on: April 8, 2020

8.7K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry

Background:

  • Density functional theory (DFT) is a widely used computational method with a strong track record in chemistry.
  • Recent DFT methods, particularly hybrid functionals, are generally reliable for main group chemistry predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate significant (8-13 kcal/mol) discrepancies in DFT predictions for organic reactions.
  • To identify the root causes of these DFT errors by moving beyond traditional benchmarks.
  • To develop and propose cost-efficient tools for improving DFT accuracy in chemical reactivity modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of DFT disagreements using advanced error decomposition techniques.
  • Comparison with affordable gold-standard reference calculations.
  • Evaluation of modern hybrid and higher-rung DFT functionals.

Main Results:

  • Successfully characterized and disentangled various functional and density-based DFT error types.
  • Identified specific DFT functionals suitable for broad mechanistic studies across different chemical systems.
  • Demonstrated the cost-efficiency and accessibility of the proposed error analysis tools.

Conclusions:

  • The developed approach enhances the reliability of DFT for mechanistic studies in main group chemistry.
  • The methodology is adaptable for transition metal, bio-, and surface chemistry, aiding predictive reactivity modeling.
  • Proposed tools can be readily integrated into standard thermochemistry workflows for improved accuracy.