Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Modeling and Evaluation of Murine Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Model
Published on: November 29, 2024
Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Heart Failure in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic
Pooya Eini1, Peyman Eini2, Homa Serpoush3
1Cardiovascular Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Background:
Heart failure is a significant complication in diabetic patients, and machine learning algorithms offer potential for early prediction. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of ML models in predicting HF among diabetic patients.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, and Scopus, identifying 2830 articles. After deduplication and screening, 16 studies were included, with 7 providing data for meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed using PROBAST+AI. A bivariate random-effects model (Stata, midas, metadta) pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for best-performing algorithms, with subgroup analyses. Heterogeneity (I2) and publication bias were assessed.
Results:
This meta-analysis of seven studies evaluating machine learning models for heart failure detection demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95% CI: 0.75-0.90), specificity of 86% (95% CI: 0.56-0.97), and an area under the ROC curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 6.6 (95% CI: 1.2-35.9), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.17 (95% CI: 0.08-0.36), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 39 (95% CI: 4-423). Significant heterogeneity was observed, primarily related to differences in study populations, machine learning algorithms, dataset sizes, and validation methods. No significant publication bias was detected.
Conclusion:
Machine learning models demonstrate promising diagnostic accuracy for heart failure detection and have the potential to support early diagnosis and risk assessment in clinical practice. However, considerable heterogeneity across studies and limited external validation highlight the need for standardised development, prospective validation, and improved interpretability of ML models to ensure their effective integration into healthcare systems.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
05:58Mouse Electroacupuncture Fixation Device Fabrication for Electroacupuncture Pretreatment in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care