Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026
Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Adenotonsillectomy vs Watchful Waiting in Pediatric Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The KATE Randomized
Isabella Sjölander1, Johan Fehrm2,3, Anna Borgström2
1Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Insights
Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) was not more effective than watchful waiting (WW) for treating mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. However, many children in the WW group eventually needed surgery.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Otolaryngology
- Sleep Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children.
- Mild to moderate OSA cases often present a dilemma between surgical intervention and conservative management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of ATE versus watchful waiting (WW) in treating otherwise healthy children with mild to moderate OSA.
- To evaluate outcomes after a 3-year follow-up period in a randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Main Methods:
- The Karolinska Adenotonsillectomy (KATE) RCT involved children aged 2-4 years with mild to moderate OSA (OAHI 2-9).
- Participants were randomized to ATE (n=29) or WW (n=31) with a 3-year follow-up.
- Outcomes included changes in Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (OAHI) and OSA-18 scores, with crossover to surgery for persistent OSA in the WW group.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in OAHI changes between ATE and WW groups (Cohen d=0.05).
- A medium effect size favoring ATE was observed in changes of total OSA-18 scores (Cohen d=0.54).
- 42% of children in the WW group crossed over to ATE due to persistent OSA symptoms.
Conclusions:
- This RCT suggests ATE is not more effective than WW for mild to moderate pediatric OSA.
- Children with mild OSA and small tonsils may be suitable candidates for WW.
- The high crossover rate in the WW group indicates a potential need for surgery in a significant proportion of these children.
Importance:
Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) is the standard procedure to treat children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Objective:
To investigate whether ATE is more effective than WW for treating otherwise healthy children with mild to moderate OSA. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) of young children investigated the benefit of ATE compared with watchful waiting (WW) after 3 years.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
The Karolinska Adenotonsillectomy (KATE) RCT was conducted between 2014 and 2020 with a 3-year follow-up and included children aged between 2 to 4 years with an Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (OAHI) score of 2 or greater and less than 10 at the otorhinolaryngology department of the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. All children were randomized to ATE (n = 29) or WW (n = 31).
Interventions:
ATE in children with OSA. Data were collected and analyzed in 2023.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Results from polysomnography (PSG) and OSA-18 questionnaire were compared between the groups with the difference between changes in OAHI as the primary outcome. Children in the WW group underwent surgical treatment (crossovers) if remaining signs of OSA; OAHI score greater than 1 and/or severe symptoms, and were offered follow-ups but excluded from the per protocol analysis.
Results:
A total of 48 of 60 children (80%) (ATE n = 23, WW n = 16, crossovers n = 9) completed the study. Thirty-nine of 60 children (65%) were analyzed per protocol, 23 (59%) from the ATE group, 16 (41%) from the WW group. No group difference was seen in changes of OAHI (Cohen d, 0.05; 95% CI, -0.7 to 0.6), but a difference of medium effect size (Cohen d, 0.54; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.1) when comparing changes in total OSA-18 score, in favor of ATE. Thirteen of 31 children (42%) in the WW group crossed over to surgery, follow-up PSG in 9 showed normalized OAHI after ATE. The crossover group had at baseline more of moderate OSA (Cohen d, 0.8; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.5), higher total OSA-18 score (Cohen d, 0.8; 95% CI, -1.5 to 0.0), and larger tonsils (Cohen d, 1.3; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.5) compared with nonoperated.
Conclusions And Relevance:
This small long-term RCT suggests that ATE was not more effective than WW. However, almost half of the children in the WW group had remaining signs of OSA and underwent surgery. Altogether, the results indicate that children with mild signs of OSA and small tonsils could be recommended WW.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02315911.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
01:26Tonsillitis II: Management
01:23Chronic Pharyngitis
Etiology
It often arises from persistent viral or bacterial infections affecting sinuses and tonsils.
Additional contributing factors include inadequate dental hygiene, mouth breathing, recurring tonsillitis, allergic rhinitis, laryngopharyngeal reflux, and exposure to smoke, chemicals, and other environmental pollutants. Allergic reactions to pollen, mold, and pet dander, chronic cough, excessive voice usage,...
01:22Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
01:29Suctioning the Nasopharyngeal Airway
Equipment Required
01:30Tonsillitis I: Introduction
Etiology
Three primary contributing factors have been identified.