Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Effectiveness of Standardized Pain Management Protocols for Acute Abdominal Pain in Emergency Departments: A
Fahim Kanani1, Nir Messer2, Majd Khalil2
1Department of Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Surgery, Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Emergency, Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv Israel.
Background:
Acute abdominal pain constitutes a substantial proportion of emergency department (ED) presentations, yet pain management remains suboptimal due to historical concerns about masking diagnoses. This systematic review comprehensively evaluates standardized pain management protocols across diverse abdominal pathologies.
Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness of standardized pain management protocols compared to usual care in reducing time to analgesia and improving pain relief outcomes for adults presenting to EDs with acute abdominal pain of visceral, biliary, renal, or pelvic origin.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2025. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with acute abdominal pain in ED settings, comparing standardized protocols (nurse-initiated, clinical pathways, patient-controlled analgesia, multimodal approaches) to usual care. Primary outcome was time to first analgesia. Secondary outcomes encompassed pain reduction, patient satisfaction, guideline adherence, and diagnostic accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane ROB-2 for randomized controlled trials and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted with comprehensive sensitivity analyses.
Results:
From 621 identified records, 47 studies (n = 8347 patients) met inclusion criteria. Time to analgesia meta-analysis (15 studies, n = 3241) demonstrated substantial reduction with standardized protocols: pooled effect size d = 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.67), representing 42.7% reduction (37.3 minutes absolute). Pain intensity reduction (18 studies, n = 3892) showed significant improvement: standardized mean differences (SMD) -0.76 (95% CI: -0.89 to -0.63). Patient satisfaction improved consistently (12 studies, risk ratios [RR] 1.43, 95% CI: 1.28-1.59). Diagnostic accuracy remained unaffected (8 studies, RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.02). Subgroup analyses confirmed benefits across all pathologies, including biliary and pelvic conditions specifically.
Conclusions:
Standardized pain management protocols demonstrate robust effectiveness in reducing time to analgesia and improving pain relief across all acute abdominal pathologies without compromising diagnostic accuracy. These findings definitively refute historical concerns and support immediate implementation in emergency departments globally.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pancreatitis II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Analgesia and Pain Management
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...

