Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Monitoring Neutrophil Elastase and Cathepsin G Activity in Human Sputum Samples
Published on: May 21, 2021
Two randomised controlled phase 2 studies of the oral neutrophil elastase inhibitor alvelestat in alpha-1 antitrypsin
J Michael Wells1,2,3, Ingrid L Titlestad4,5, Hanan Tanash6
1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA jmwells@uabmc.edu.
Background:
Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disorder that causes emphysema from lack of the alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) serpin antiprotease, leading to protease-antiprotease imbalance. Weekly intravenous AAT therapy (augmentation) is the only specific treatment available. Alvelestat is an oral inhibitor of neutrophil elastase (NE) in development as a novel approach to AATD therapy. Here, we tested the safety and mechanistic efficacy of alvelestat in severe AATD.
Methods:
We conducted two complementary, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials, incorporating two doses of alvelestat in AATD. ATALANTa investigated 120 mg twice daily, including a subset of participants also receiving augmentation; ASTRAEUS tested 120 and 240 mg twice daily without augmentation. Primary and secondary end-points were the change in blood NE (the putative target) and its activity in AATD (Aα-Val360 and desmosine/isodesmosine) as well as safety and tolerability.
Results:
We enrolled 161 participants (63 in ATALANTa and 98 in ASTRAEUS). Blood NE was significantly suppressed in both studies at both doses, with the greatest effect (>90% suppression) at alvelestat 240 mg twice daily. There was no effect of alvelestat 120 mg on disease activity biomarkers, while 240 mg demonstrated significant reduction in Aα-Val360 and desmosine. The most common adverse event was headache, particularly at the 240 mg dose. No safety signals of concern were detected.
Conclusions:
Alvelestat effectively suppressed NE and its activity at both doses, but only the 240 mg twice-daily dose demonstrated relevant efficacy compared to placebo on disease activity biomarkers with a favourable safety profile. These findings support progression of the 240 mg twice-daily dose into a clinical end-point study.

