Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI01:14

Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI

802
Introduction: MRI and CT scans are crucial advancements in medical imaging techniques, playing a vital role in diagnosing conditions related to the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Each scan serves distinct purposes, targets specific areas, and requires unique nursing duties.
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
802
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

8.0K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health system learning enables generalist neuroimaging models.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

The lipedema common case report form as a research tool: standardizing lipedema data collection.

Frontiers in global women's health·2026
Same author

OPTN/SRTR 2024 Annual Data Report: Lung.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2026
Same author

Severe Nonketotic Hyperglycinemia in Twins Caused by GLDC Variants: The Importance of Accurate Prenatal Variant Interpretation, Counseling, and VUS Disclosure.

Prenatal diagnosis·2026
Same author

Sex Differences in Heart Transplantation Outcomes: A 5-Year Review of the 2018 U.S. Allocation Policy.

JACC. Advances·2026
Same author

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting of the bladder is feasible in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

High Resolution 3D Imaging of Ex-Vivo Biological Samples by Micro CT
08:57

High Resolution 3D Imaging of Ex-Vivo Biological Samples by Micro CT

Published on: June 21, 2011

19.2K

Temporal Bone Anatomy at 0.55 T: Comparison to 1.5/3T MR and High-Resolution CT.

Radhika Rajeev1, Lauren J Kelsey1, Nicole Seiberlich1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (R.R., L.J.K., N.S., A.S., M.I., E.L., V.G., J.B., S.M.).

Academic Radiology
|September 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Whole-body 0.55 Tesla MRI offers an acceptable alternative for internal auditory canal imaging compared to higher field strengths. This lower field strength provides comparable visualization of anatomy and cochlear measurements, making it a viable option.

Keywords:
0.55 T MRIInner Ear ImagingInternal Auditory Canal

More Related Videos

A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT
07:10

A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.5K
High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

High Resolution 3D Imaging of Ex-Vivo Biological Samples by Micro CT
08:57

High Resolution 3D Imaging of Ex-Vivo Biological Samples by Micro CT

Published on: June 21, 2011

19.2K
A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT
07:10

A Sectioning, Coring, and Image Processing Guide for High-Throughput Cortical Bone Sample Procurement and Analysis for Synchrotron Micro-CT

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.5K
High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

13.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Conventional MRI at 1.5T/3T is standard for internal auditory canal (IAC) imaging.
  • Susceptibility artifacts near air-bone interfaces can affect image quality at higher field strengths.
  • Lower field strength MRI may offer improved field homogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate 0.55 Tesla (T) whole-body MRI as a clinically acceptable alternative to 1.5T/3T for IAC imaging.
  • To compare image quality, anatomical visualization, and cochlear measurements between 0.55T and 1.5T/3T MRI.
  • To assess the potential of 0.55T MRI to reduce susceptibility artifacts.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 25 patients with 0.55T IAC MRI and comparative 1.5T/3T scans.
  • Inclusion of high-resolution CT (HRCT) for a subset of 13 patients.
  • Independent assessment by 3 neuroradiologists evaluating anatomical visibility and image quality (4-point Likert scale) and measuring cochlear and IAC dimensions.

Main Results:

  • All readers found 0.55T MRI visualization of IAC anatomy clinically acceptable (scores ≥ 2).
  • Two readers reported no significant difference in anatomical visualization between 0.55T and higher field strengths.
  • Quantitative measurements (cochlear/IAC dimensions) at 0.55T were comparable to 1.5T/3T, though one reader rated 0.55T image quality lower.

Conclusions:

  • 0.55 Tesla MRI using a 3D T2w SPACE sequence is a clinically acceptable alternative for IAC and inner ear imaging.
  • This lower field strength demonstrates comparable diagnostic utility to conventional 1.5T/3T MRI for these specific structures.
  • 0.55T MRI may be advantageous due to reduced susceptibility artifacts near air-bone interfaces.