Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Stroke risk in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis and meta regression
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes1, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus2, Maria Eduarda Cavalcanti Souza3
1Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, 66073-005, Brazil. francisco.cezar2205@gmail.com.
Introduction:
It is suggested that survivors of different types of cancer may have an increased risk of stroke. Our study aims to evaluate cancer patients and non-cancer controls by analyzing stroke events in each group. Previous studies concluded that certain types of cancer increased stroke risk, however, their results had significant heterogeneity and statistical concerns.
Methods:
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until February 18th, 2024, assessing stroke in cancer survivor patients compared to the global population. Data were examined using the Mantel-Haenszel method and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Rstudio software, version 4.2.3., was used for statistical analysis.
Results:
A total of 18 studies were included, and stroke was reported in both cancer and non-cancer groups. Breast cancer (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17; p = 0.01; I²= 0%), Central Nervous System cancers (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.01-6.01; p = 0.047; I²= 78%), cervical cancers (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.19-2.09; p = 0.001; I²= 0%), head and neck cancers (HR 1.4439; 95% CI 1.3095-1.5922; p < 0.001; I²=31.5%), lung cancers (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.40-1.83; p < 0.001; I²=67%), multiple myeloma (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.32-1.89; p < 0.001; I²= 49%), nasopharyngeal cancers (HR 1.9178; 95% CI 1.3358-2.7533; p < 0.001; I²=89.7%), oesophageal cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07-1.65; p = 0.009; I²= 0%), ovarian cancers (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.07-1.65; p = 0.01; I²= 38%), pancreatic cancers (HR 2,70; 95% CI 2.34-3.11; p < 0.001; I²= 0%) and rectum cancers (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.01-1.63; p = 0.04; I²= 0%) showed statistically significant differences between groups in favor of non-cancer controls.
Conclusions:
In this meta-analysis, the stroke risk was increased in all cancers that reached statistical significance. Furthermore, our study brings relevant data to the body of literature concerning this long-term clinical uncertainty.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

