Safety and prognostic value of left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in dilated cardiomyopathy
Elham Kayvanpour1,2, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani1,2, Daniel Tian Li1,2
1Department of Medicine III, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Insights
Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is safe and effective for assessing collagen volume fraction (CVF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Higher LV-CVF predicts worse outcomes, offering valuable prognostic insight beyond traditional markers.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pathology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- The prognostic value of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM) remains debated.
- Accurate assessment of myocardial fibrosis is crucial for patient management and risk stratification in DCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the extent of left ventricular collagen volume fraction (LV-CVF) in DCM patients.
- To evaluate LV-CVF as a prognostic marker in DCM.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 524 patients with suspected DCM undergoing left ventricular EMB (LV-EMB).
- Quantification of LV-CVF using automated image processing of high-resolution EMB scans.
- Assessment of clinical outcomes including heart failure events, sudden cardiac death, and all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- LV-EMB demonstrated a low complication rate (0.76% major, 2.1% minor).
- Higher LV-CVF (>32%) was significantly associated with an increased risk of composite endpoints (heart failure, sudden death, transplantation) and all-cause mortality.
- LV-CVF emerged as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular EMB is a safe diagnostic procedure for DCM patients.
- LV-CVF quantification from EMB provides significant prognostic information.
- LV-CVF offers added prognostic value beyond established markers like LVEF and NT-proBNP.
Aims:
The need to perform endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathies (DCM) is debated. Here we sought to determine the extent of left ventricular collagen volume fraction (LV-CVF) in DCM patients and to evaluate it as a prognostic marker.
Methods And Results:
In this retrospective longitudinal study, we included 524 patients with suspected DCM who underwent left ventricular EMB (LV-EMB) as a part of their clinical work-up. LV-CVF was quantified using automated image processing of high-resolution scans of LV-EMB. Deep phenotyping was performed including assessment of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Endpoints were (i) composite endpoint of heart failure-related death, sudden cardiac death, aborted sudden cardiac death (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, reported sustained ventricular tachycardia, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation), or cardiac transplantation, and (ii) all-cause mortality. LV-EMB was associated with 0.76% major and 2.1% minor complications. No death occurred due to EMB. LV-CVF could be reliably quantified using Bayesian classification. During a median follow-up of 43.2 months (2084 patient-years), 48 patients with LV-CVF >32% and 14 patients with LV-CVF ≤32% reached the composite endpoint (log-rank p < 0.0001). A total of 62 patients reached the endpoint all-cause mortality, from which 38 presented with LV-CVF >32% and 17 with LV-CVF ≤32% (log-rank p = 0.009). In multivariable analyses, LV-CVF and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.11) were independent predictors of unfavourable outcome.
Conclusions:
Left ventricular EMB is a safe diagnostic procedure. The extent of CVF in LV-EMB provides prognostic information in patients with DCM in addition to existing measures of left ventricular ejection fraction or NT-proBNP.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care


