Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

223
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
223
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

454
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
454
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

65.2K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
65.2K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

500
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
500

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remodelling of body composition surrounding the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in three longitudinal cohorts.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

Co-removal of norfloxacin and Cr(VI) by Co/N-doped carbon activating peroxymonosulfate: <sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub> oxidation coupled with interfacial electron transfer.

Environmental research·2026
Same author

QS-MADS: quorum sensing perturbation-driven adaptive multi-agent scheduling for distributed power grids.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Focus on the essentials: Learning to attend to the most critical information for visual question answering.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2026
Same author

Active fluidics at lower intraocular pressure reduces intraoperative discomfort during phacoemulsification: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Twin contrastive interventional-cause hashing for unsupervised cross-modal retrieval.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K

Counterfactual causal inference for robust visual question answering.

Wei Li1, Zhixin Li2, Fuyun Deng2

  • 1Key Lab of Education Blockchain and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, China; Guangxi Key Lab of Multi-source Information Mining and Security, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, China; School of Computer Science, Liupanshui Normal University, Liupanshui, 553004, China.

Neural Networks : the Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society
|September 19, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel counterfactual causal framework (CC-VQA) to address biases in Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems. CC-VQA enhances model accuracy and generalization by disentangling multimodal data correlations.

Keywords:
Causal graphsCounterfactual inferenceMultimodal learningVisual question answering

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision
  • Natural Language Processing

Background:

  • Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems leverage multimodal data but suffer from inherent language and vision biases, limiting generalization.
  • Existing VQA models often fail to generalize due to spurious correlations between modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel counterfactual causal framework (CC-VQA) for mitigating cross-modality biases in VQA.
  • To enhance the accuracy, robustness, and generalization capabilities of VQA models.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a counterfactual causal framework (CC-VQA) employing Counterfactual Sample Synthesis (CSS) and causal inference.
  • Utilized causal graphs to disentangle spurious correlations within multimodal data.
  • Proposed a contrastive loss mechanism and a robust training strategy to improve model performance.

Main Results:

  • CC-VQA demonstrated substantial improvements in bias mitigation and overall accuracy on benchmark datasets (VQA-CP v2, VQA v2).
  • The framework effectively disentangled spurious correlations, leading to more balanced and precise multimodal reasoning.
  • Outperformed state-of-the-art methods in enhancing VQA system performance.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed CC-VQA framework offers an effective solution for addressing biases in VQA systems.
  • CC-VQA significantly improves the generalization and accuracy of VQA models through causal inference and robust training.
  • This work advances the field of multimodal AI by providing a method for unbiased and robust visual question answering.