Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

904
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
904
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

292
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
292
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

609
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
609
Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving01:29

Mathematical Modeling: Problem Solving

278
Mathematical modeling transforms real-world scenarios into mathematical expressions, allowing for structured problem-solving and analysis. This process involves defining the situation, assigning variables to measurable quantities, selecting an appropriate model, and solving the resulting equation. Such models are invaluable in finance, providing precise methods to evaluate investments, loans, and repayment structures.A widely used example is the calculation of fixed monthly payments on a loan,...
278

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dementia Risk: Integrating Mendelian Randomization and Target Trial Emulation Within the Heart-Brain Axis.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Cardiovascular Disease Subtypes and Alzheimer's Disease: Phenotypic and Genetic Associations in the UK Biobank and All of Us Research Program.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Atrial Fibrillation in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Marker of Disease Severity but Not an Independent Predictor of Mortality.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Cardio-oncology in Latin America and the Caribbean. Current state.

Ecancermedicalscience·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence in nuclear cardiology: Technical perspectives, strategic directions, and recommendations from an IAEA expert working group.

Seminars in nuclear medicine·2025
Same author

Multimodality Imaging in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and ATTR Wild-Type Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

A New Method of Modeling the Multi-stage Decision-Making Process of CRT Using Machine Learning with Uncertainty

Kristoffer Larsen1, Chen Zhao2, Zhuo He2

  • 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
|September 20, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel multi-stage machine learning model to predict heart failure patients' response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The model efficiently uses uncertainty quantification to reduce the need for costly SPECT MPI data, maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Keywords:
CRTMachine learningMulti-stageSPECT MPIUncertainty quantification

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Machine learning models for predicting patient outcomes often use all available data, disregarding acquisition costs.
  • Predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients is crucial for effective treatment.
  • Current methods may not optimally balance predictive performance with the cost and time of data acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a multi-stage machine learning (ML) model for predicting CRT response in HF patients.
  • To integrate uncertainty quantification to guide the selective acquisition of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) data.
  • To reduce data acquisition costs without compromising predictive accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-stage ML model was constructed by combining two ensemble models.
  • Ensemble 1 utilized clinical variables and electrocardiogram (ECG) data.
  • Ensemble 2 incorporated SPECT MPI features, with uncertainty quantification from Ensemble 1 dictating the need for SPECT MPI data.

Main Results:

  • The multi-stage model achieved performance comparable to a model using all SPECT MPI data (AUC 0.75 vs. 0.77).
  • It required SPECT MPI data for only 52.7% of patients, significantly reducing data acquisition needs.
  • Key performance metrics included accuracy of 0.71 and sensitivity of 0.70 for the multi-stage model.

Conclusions:

  • The developed multi-stage ML model effectively predicts CRT response in HF patients.
  • Uncertainty quantification enables significant reduction in SPECT MPI data acquisition without substantial performance loss.
  • This approach offers a cost-effective strategy for personalized HF treatment prediction.