Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Utility of the Social Vulnerability Index in Addressing Breast Cancer Disparities: A Meta-Analysis
Antoinette T Nguyen1, Rena A Li2, Nicole C Ontiveros2
1University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, USA.
Objective:
To evaluate the utility of the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) in understanding disparities in breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality.
Background:
Despite major advances in breast cancer detection and treatment, significant disparities persist-particularly among socioeconomically and geographically vulnerable populations. The SVI, developed by the CDC, is a composite index that captures community-level vulnerability across multiple social domains and may serve as a tool to identify and address inequities in cancer care.
Methods:
This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024616874). PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched for studies examining associations between SVI and breast cancer outcomes. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or appropriate Cochrane tools. Meta-analyses were performed where applicable.
Results:
Fifteen studies were included. Seven studies examined screening; a pooled meta-analysis (n = 3) showed reduced screening in high-SVI areas (pooled OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.24-1.26; I² = 99%). Four studies reported reduced incidence in high-SVI populations, likely reflecting underdiagnosis. Five studies demonstrated increased mortality in high-SVI populations, with ORs ranging from 1.09 to 2.84. Other studies addressed comorbidities, access to care, and disease subtypes.
Conclusion:
The SVI is a valuable, multidimensional tool for characterizing and addressing disparities in breast cancer outcomes, with implications for public health interventions and policy.
More Related Videos
08:57Evaluating the Effect of SASP Factors on the Proliferation of Cancer Cells Using a Comparative Analysis of Three Distinct Methodologies
Published on: September 19, 2025
07:44Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Relative Risk
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...