Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Fracture strength of additively manufactured implant-supported resin-based crowns on polyetheretherketone and
Doğu Ömür Dede1, Mustafa Borga Dönmez2, Gülce Çakmak3
1Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Statement Of Problem:
Implant-supported crowns can be fabricated using additive (AM) or subtractive manufacturing (SM) with resin-based materials. However, their fracture strength on different implant abutments remains unclear.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fracture strength (FS) and failure modes of AM interim crowns cemented on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium (Ti) abutments and compare them with SM crowns.
Material And Methods:
Sixty-four implant-supported crowns were fabricated from 3 AM resins (Crowntec [AM_CT], FREEPRINT temp [AM_FP], Varseosmile Crown Plus [AM_VS]) and one SM resin (M-PM Disc [SM_MPM]) (N=16). The crowns were cemented on 1-piece PEEK or Ti abutments (n=8) using dual-polymerizing self-adhesive resin cement after standardized surface treatments. All specimens were subjected to thermomechanical aging (5000 thermal cycles, 250 000 cycles at 49 N, 1.7 Hz) followed by FS testing. Failures were classified as repairable crown crack or fracture, catastrophic crown fracture without abutment damage, abutment distortion without crown damage, or crown and abutment damage. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey test and chi-squared test were used for statistical analysis (α=.05).
Results:
All specimens survived cyclic loading. While Ti-supported crowns fractured consistently through catastrophic crown failure without abutment damage, most PEEK-supported crowns exhibited inconsistent failure patterns involving abutment distortion or combined crown-abutment damage. Only 6 crowns on PEEK abutments (4 AM_CT and 2 AM_FP) failed without abutment damage, making statistical comparison unreliable. Therefore, PEEK-supported crowns were excluded from statistical analysis. Among Ti groups, SM_MPM crowns demonstrated the highest FS, followed by AM_CT, while AM_FP and AM_VS showed significantly lower FS values (P≤.003). The distribution of failure modes differed significantly among crown materials, abutment types, and their combinations (P≤.014).
Conclusions:
Crowns on Ti abutments fractured without abutment damage, with SM_MPM resulting in the highest FS, followed by AM_CT. In contrast, most PEEK-supported crowns exhibited abutment distortion without crown damage or simultaneous crown and abutment damage.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...